23.02.2013 Views

Plant basal resistance - Universiteit Utrecht

Plant basal resistance - Universiteit Utrecht

Plant basal resistance - Universiteit Utrecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Natural variation in responsiveness of callose deposition to PAMPs<br />

45<br />

Genetic dissection of <strong>basal</strong> defence responsiveness<br />

To examine genetic variation in sensitivity of locally expressed defence responses that are<br />

not directly under control by JA or SA, we quantified callose intensities upon treatment with<br />

the fungal PAMP elicitor chitosan and the bacterial PAMP elicitor flg22. Seedlings of the<br />

six accessions were cultivated in a hydroponic growth medium and examined for levels of<br />

callose deposition at 24 h after mock or PAMP treatment, using a standardised quantification<br />

method as described previously (Luna et al., 2011). Although all accessions showed a<br />

statistically significant increase in callose deposition after chitosan treatment, there was<br />

substantial variation in the intensity of this defence response (Figure 5). On average, Col-<br />

0 and Ws-2 deposited 5-fold more callose than accessions Bur-0, No-0, Sf-2 and Can-0.<br />

Similar patterns were observed upon treatment with flg22 (Figure 5), with the exception<br />

of accession Ws-2, which lacked flg22-induced callose due to a dysfunctional FLS2 receptor<br />

(Gomez-Gomez and Boller, 2000). Interestingly, when comparing natural variation in PAMP-<br />

induced callose to natural variation in SA-induced PR-1 expression (Figure 3), an inverse<br />

relationship can be noted: accessions with a modest callose response are primed to respond<br />

to SA, while accessions with a primed callose responsive are relatively un-responsive to SA.<br />

Figure 5: Natural variation in PAMP-induced callose deposition. Eight-days-old seedlings were treated<br />

with either 0.1% chitosan or 1µM flg22. After 24 h, cotyledons were stained for callose with analine<br />

blue. Callose intensities were digitally quantified from photographs by UV epifluorescence microscopy.<br />

Values represent averages of the relative number of callose-corresponding pixels (n = 15; ± SEM).<br />

Identification of a locus regulating responsiveness of SA-induced PR-1 expression<br />

To dissect the genetic variation in defence gene responsiveness, we performed QTL<br />

mapping analysis, using a fully genotyped core population of 164 RILs from a cross between

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!