28.02.2013 Views

Practical Ship Hydrodynamics

Practical Ship Hydrodynamics

Practical Ship Hydrodynamics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Ship</strong> manoeuvring 185<br />

attack ˛ of nearly the same size in initial turning, of smaller size during steady<br />

turning and of larger size in the yaw checking phase.)<br />

Because of the different stall angles ˛s and lift curve slopes of rudders of<br />

different aspect ratios it would be advantageous to use an effective rudder<br />

angle υeff instead of the geometrical rudder angle υ for rules, e.g., about the<br />

maximum rudder angle and the rudder rate of the steering gear, as well as<br />

for nautical use. This would be ‘fairer’ for rudders of different aspect ratio;<br />

it would also make better use of rudders of smaller aspect ratio (today their<br />

greater stall angle ˛s is frequently not realized because of a too small maximum<br />

rudder angle υ) and would lead to more equal response of different ships on<br />

(effective) rudder angles. If geometric and effective rudder angles are defined<br />

to coincide for a normal aspect ratio of 3 D 2, their relationship is (Fig. 5.15):<br />

δ eff/δ geom<br />

υeff D<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

2.2 Ð 3<br />

Ð υ<br />

3 C 2.4<br />

1 2 3<br />

L<br />

Figure 5.15 Ratio between effective and geometrical angle of attack<br />

For aspect ratios 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!