28.02.2013 Views

Practical Ship Hydrodynamics

Practical Ship Hydrodynamics

Practical Ship Hydrodynamics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72 <strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Ship</strong> <strong>Hydrodynamics</strong><br />

S is the wetted surface in calm water, Vs the ship speed. The resistance coefficient<br />

of the ship is then determined as:<br />

cTs D cFs C cR C cA D cFs C ⊲cTm cFm⊳ C cA<br />

The index s again denotes values for the full-scale ship, the index m values<br />

for the model. cR is assumed to be independent of model scale, i.e. cR is the<br />

same for model and full scale. The model test serves primarily to determine<br />

cR. The procedure is as follows:<br />

1. Determine the total resistance coefficient in the model test:<br />

cTm D<br />

RTm<br />

1<br />

2 m Ð V 2 m Ð Sm<br />

2. Determine the residual resistance, same for model and ship:<br />

cR D cTm cFm<br />

3. Determine the total resistance coefficient for the ship:<br />

cTs D cR C cFs C cA<br />

4. Determine the total resistance for the ship:<br />

RTs D cTs Ð 1<br />

2 sV 2 s Ss<br />

The frictional coefficients cF are determined by the ITTC 1957 formula:<br />

cF D<br />

0.075<br />

⊲log 10 Rn 2⊳ 2<br />

This formula already contains a global form effect increasing the value of cF<br />

by 12% compared to the value for flat plates (Hughes formula).<br />

Historically cA was a roughness allowance coefficient which considered<br />

that the model was smooth while the full-scale ship was rough, especially<br />

when ship hulls where still riveted. However, with the advent of welded ships<br />

cA sometimes became negative for fast and big ships. Therefore, cA is more<br />

appropriately termed the correlation coefficient. cA encompasses collectively<br />

all corrections, including roughness allowance, but also particularities of the<br />

measuring device of the model basin, errors in the model–ship correlation line<br />

and the method. Model basins use cA not as a constant, but as a function of the<br />

ship size, based on experience. The correlation coefficient makes predictions<br />

from various model basins difficult to compare and may in fact be abused to<br />

derive overly optimistic speed prediction to please customers.<br />

Formulae for cA differ between various model basins and shipyards. Examples<br />

are Table 3.1 and:<br />

cA D 0.35 Ð 10 3<br />

cA D 0.11 Ð ⊲Rn Ð 10 9<br />

2 Ð Lpp Ð 10 6<br />

2.1 a⊳ 2<br />

a D max⊲0.6, min⊲CB, 0.8⊳⊳<br />

a C 0.62 with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!