Practical Ship Hydrodynamics
Practical Ship Hydrodynamics
Practical Ship Hydrodynamics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
64 <strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Ship</strong> <strong>Hydrodynamics</strong><br />
Schneekluth and Bertram (1998) give several empirical formulae to estimate<br />
w in simple design approaches. All these formulae consider only a few main<br />
parameters, but actually the shape of the ship influences the wake considerably.<br />
Other important parameter like propeller diameter and propeller clearance are<br />
also not explicitly represented in these simple design formulae.<br />
The ratio of the effective power to the thrust power is called the hull efficiency:<br />
H D PE<br />
PT<br />
D RT Ð Vs<br />
T Ð VA<br />
D<br />
1 t<br />
1 w<br />
The hull efficiency can thus be expressed solely by thrust deduction factor t<br />
and wake fraction w. H can be less or greater than 1. It is thus not really an<br />
efficiency which by definition cannot be greater than 100%.<br />
The power delivered at the propeller can be expressed by the torque and<br />
the rpm:<br />
PD D 2 Ð n Ð Q<br />
This power is less than the ‘brake power’ directly at the ship engine PB due<br />
to losses in shaft and bearings. These losses are comprehensively expressed<br />
in the shafting efficiency S: PD D S Ð PB. The ship hydrodynamicist is not<br />
concerned with PB and can consider PD as the input power to all further<br />
considerations of optimizing the ship hydrodynamics. We use here a simplified<br />
definition for the shafting efficiency. Usually marine engineers decompose<br />
S into a shafting efficiency that accounts for the losses in the shafting only and<br />
an additional mechanical efficiency. For the ship hydrodynamicist it suffices<br />
to know that the power losses between engine and delivered power are typically<br />
1.5–2%.<br />
The losses from delivered power PD to thrust power PT are expressed in<br />
the (propeller) efficiency behind ship B: PT D B Ð PD.<br />
The open-water characteristics of the propeller are relatively easy to measure<br />
and compute. The open-water efficiency 0 of the propeller is, however,<br />
different to B. Theoretically, the relative rotative efficiency R accounts for<br />
the differences between the open-water test and the inhomogeneous threedimensional<br />
propeller inflow encountered in propulsion conditions: B D R Ð<br />
0. In reality, the propeller efficiency behind the ship cannot be measured<br />
and all effects not included in the hull efficiency, i.e. wake and thrust deduction<br />
fraction, are included in R. R again is not truly an efficiency. Typical<br />
values for single-screw ships range from 1.02 to 1.06. Schneekluth and Bertram<br />
(1998) give again simple empirical formulae for design purposes.<br />
The various powers and efficiencies can be expressed as follows:<br />
PB >PD >PT >PE<br />
PE D H Ð PT D H Ð B Ð PD D H Ð 0 Ð R Ð PD D H Ð 0 Ð R Ð S Ð PB<br />
D D Ð S Ð PB<br />
The propulsive efficiency D collectively expresses the hydrodynamic efficiencies:<br />
D D H Ð 0 Ð R. Schneekluth and Bertram (1998) again give simple<br />
design estimates for D.