Practical Ship Hydrodynamics
Practical Ship Hydrodynamics
Practical Ship Hydrodynamics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.4 Simple design approaches<br />
Resistance and propulsion 83<br />
In early design stages, the power requirements have to be estimated to judge<br />
the weight and volume requirements of the main engine and fuel. As this has<br />
to be done repeatedly in design loops, model tests are no suitable solution<br />
for reasons of time and costs. Instead, simple, largely empirical methods are<br />
employed which only require a few global design parameters. These methods<br />
are discussed in more detail by Schneekluth and Bertram (1998).<br />
The main approaches are:<br />
ž estimate from parent ship, e.g. by admiralty or similar formulae<br />
ž systematical series, e.g. Taylor–Gertler, Series-60, SSPA<br />
ž regression analysis of many ships, e.g. Lap–Keller, Holtrop–Mennen,<br />
Hollenbach<br />
The estimate from a parent ship may give good estimates if the parent ship is<br />
close enough (in geometrical properties and speed parameters) to the design<br />
ship. The admiralty formula is very coarse and not recommended, but an<br />
estimate based on a form factor approach is popular in practice. Here, it is<br />
usually assumed that the parameter cw/F4 n and the form factor remain constant<br />
in the conversion from parent ship to design ship. Such a more or less sophisticated<br />
plus/minus conversion from a parent ship is currently the preferred<br />
choice for a quick estimate.<br />
All of the systematical series and most of the regression analysis approaches<br />
are outdated. They often underestimate the actual resistance of modern ship<br />
hulls. It may come as a surprise that older ships were apparently better in<br />
terms of resistance. There are several explanations:<br />
ž suitability for container stowage plays a larger role in modern ships;<br />
ž modern ships often have a higher propulsive efficiency compensating<br />
partially for the higher resistance;<br />
ž more severe safety regulations, e.g. concerning stability, pose additional<br />
constraints on the hydrodynamic optimization.<br />
Nevertheless, some of the old estimation methods are still popular as they are<br />
easy to program. Thus they are embedded in naval architectural CAD systems<br />
or more recently in design expert systems. However, they are fundamentally<br />
limited to global predictions, as they represent the hull shape by few global<br />
parameters.<br />
3.5 CFD approaches for steady flow<br />
3.5.1 Wave resistance computations<br />
The wave resistance problem considers the steady motion of a ship in initially<br />
smooth water assuming an ideal fluid, i.e. especially neglecting all viscous<br />
effects. The ship will create waves at the freely deformable water surface.<br />
The computations involve far more information than the mere resistance<br />
which is of minor importance in many applications and usually computed<br />
quite inaccurately. But the expression ‘wave resistance problem’ is easier than<br />
‘steady, inviscid straight-ahead course problem’, and thus more popular.