01.03.2013 Views

EUROCODE 2 WORKED EXAMPLES - Federbeton

EUROCODE 2 WORKED EXAMPLES - Federbeton

EUROCODE 2 WORKED EXAMPLES - Federbeton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EC2 – worked examples 6-57<br />

Code 90. It has be notice, however, that from stress calculation neither for the quasipermanent<br />

combination nor in the rare one, the maximum stress results tensile. Therefore,<br />

no specific reinforcement is required and it is sufficient to arrange the minimum amount of<br />

reinforcing steel, able to ensure a ductile behaviour in case of corrosion of prestressing<br />

steel.<br />

Table of Content<br />

Deformation<br />

Deformation limitation is carried out to control the maximum vertical deflection for<br />

passengers comfort. The limit values δ/L (deflection/span Length) are given by the<br />

Eurocode 1.3 as a function of the span length and the train speed. The limit value for<br />

maximum vertical deflection is calculated considering a span length of 27.75 m (central<br />

span) and a train speed over 280 km/h; according to the provisions of the Code, it results:<br />

δ<br />

L =<br />

1<br />

1600<br />

that should be multiplied by a factor 1.1 for continuous structures; finally, the following<br />

limit may be achieved:<br />

δlim 11 . 1<br />

= =<br />

L 1600 1455<br />

As a consequence of the transient nature of this event, the elastic deflection, calculated<br />

by the FEM model, is relative to the only live load; the check shall be performed loading<br />

only one track, reading the maximum deflection in correspondence of the track axis.<br />

Having loaded the right track with a LM71 load model plus dynamic allowance, placed in<br />

the middle of the of the central span, the obtained δ/L value is:<br />

δ effective<br />

L<br />

0. 0055<br />

= =<br />

27. 75<br />

and it results lower than the corresponding limit.<br />

1<br />

5045<br />

It can be notice that no further calculation is requested because, due to prestressing<br />

effect, the structure remains entirely compressed, so that the elastic value, calculated by the<br />

FEM analysis, has to be considered.<br />

6.15.5 Verification of Ultimate Limit State<br />

Verification at ULS should regard the structure as a whole and its component parts,<br />

analysing the resistance of the critical regions. In addition to the analysis of ULS of<br />

several shell element under the relevant combination of internal actions, in this example<br />

some case of detailing are investigated, i.e.:<br />

− bursting force at anchorage of prestressing tendon;<br />

− spalling force at anchorage of prestressing tendon;<br />

− punching under support plate.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!