06.03.2013 Views

katalog

katalog

katalog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

АРНАуТ мИК<br />

AERNOUt MiK<br />

128<br />

Aernout Mik’s work seamlessly combines expert filmmaking,<br />

elegant architecture, an understanding of group behavior,<br />

an appreciation of how people move through various types<br />

of space, and a keen sense of social responsibility. It subverts<br />

both notions of art's traditional disciplines and conventional<br />

ways of thinking bout it. Mik sculpts walls in which screens<br />

adhere; or he makes his “freestanding” screens into sculpt-<br />

ural objects that invite their own contemplation from viewers.<br />

In encountering a piece by Mik there are many aspects to<br />

consider: how the images on the screen arrest the viewer<br />

and then how they may be read; the shape, size, and place-<br />

ment of the screen itself; the relationship of the screen to its<br />

frame (if it has one) and certainly to the wall(s) away from<br />

which the screen “stands”; and because the screens frequently<br />

touch the floor and are built lower than the height<br />

of the average person, one also has to consider the other<br />

viewers who come upon, stop, move about and experience<br />

Mik’s work. He assumes, quite rightly, that viewers attend<br />

his pieces with a baggage of information derived from mass<br />

media. His moving images refer to current events—protests,<br />

police actions, reactions to catastrophes—without ever<br />

explaining or specifying them. With sweeping cameras<br />

Mik records what appears to be an event in which there are<br />

separate groups, sometimes co-mingling and absorbing one<br />

into the other, and sometimes remaining apart. An intimation<br />

of impending violence is obtained. But there is no<br />

resolution because there is no drama. In a Mik event things<br />

may happen, but they happen without regard to plot and<br />

with no semblance of beginning, middle or end. Things<br />

happen over a certain period, and then, after a while, they<br />

happen again. Mik’s pieces are time-based, but he cannily<br />

squeezes out the notion of duration from time,making that<br />

particular measure dimensionless. We will consider three<br />

of his most distinctive works. Schoolyard (2009), a two<br />

screen piece, is classic Mik. It stops the unsuspecting<br />

viewer in their tracks.<br />

Describing some disturbance in a vocational school<br />

which is being evacuated, the images suggest a cultural<br />

conflict which may turn brutal. Its large cast is splintered<br />

into various groups choreographed with purpose, but those<br />

purposes are never articulated. Vacuum Room (2005) is<br />

a gallery piece, as required by its architecture. Rear<br />

projectors cast images from surveillance cameras in a<br />

legislative or judicial chamber into which protestors burst,<br />

interrupting a session. The enveloping nature of the piece,<br />

and the idea that the cameras, being surveillance, are fixed<br />

in place and cannot move except on their own axis, make<br />

this work distinctive. Finally, Raw Footage (2006), is in its<br />

conception unlike Mik’s other works. It is edited from unused<br />

newsreel footage shot during the civil war in the Balkans.<br />

Mik took the footage as it came from the camera, both<br />

image and sound (this is the only one of Mik’s pieces with<br />

a track), and edited it into “chapters” or “episodes” with<br />

darkness between incidents. Although Raw Footage uses<br />

documentary material of soldiers and civilians assuming<br />

a normalcy in a time of crises, its actuality indicates how<br />

slippery and strange reality is, affirming with a quiet devastation<br />

the adage “Truth is Stranger than Fiction”.<br />

Laurence Kardish<br />

in Exit 100 Video Artist, Exitmedia, 2010<br />

Pages 122–123 and 126–127:<br />

stills from Scapegoats, 2006<br />

video installation, digital video on hard drive, freestanding screen, 39 minutes<br />

Produced by bak, basis voor actuele kunst and the artist<br />

courtesy carlier | gebauer, berlin<br />

Page 125:<br />

installation view: kunstverein hannover, 2007<br />

Photographer: raimund zakowski<br />

courtesy carlier | gebauer, berlin<br />

Scapegoats, 2006<br />

Scapegoats is set in and around an unspecified sports arena.<br />

Most of the action takes place in a large area at the center<br />

of the complex, which has been transformed into a refugee<br />

camp or holding point of some kind. Stations devoted to<br />

different functions—sleeping, cooking, storage, medical<br />

care—have been loosely organized into zones. Military<br />

operations dominate the entire atmosphere, from combat<br />

trucks parked inside the arena to frequent displays of<br />

weaponry. The people inhabiting the scene can be broken<br />

down into two groups: Those who are in control and those<br />

who must follow orders. Commanders continually line up<br />

their charges, only sometimes allowing them to rest on the<br />

ground with their hands on their heads. An adolescent boy<br />

is given the responsibility of carrying a rifle as he patrols<br />

a group of detainees. At the same time, more prosaic scenes<br />

unfold: a portable stove and cafe tables form a makeshift<br />

canteen and cots provide a place to rest.<br />

The divisions and allegiances between the groups remain<br />

tenuous. The captors wear military-oriented garb, but the<br />

aernout mik was born 1962 in the Netherlands, where he lives and works.since 1995 aernout mik is working with film, video,<br />

photography in order to create laboratory settings which, parallel to the real world, create situations reflecting on the conditions<br />

of humans at work, at play etc. his video installations are a delicate act of balance between staged drama or real event. reconstructing<br />

events on the periphery of our social reality, mik constantly shows scenarios shaped by hierarchy or political domination.<br />

ragtag nature of their clothes does not belie any distinct<br />

political leaning or nationality. The visual similarities<br />

between all of the factions—soldiers, prisoners in uniform,<br />

and those who are partially dressed in both civilian and<br />

military attire—further the confusion and make it impossible<br />

to place people into distinct categories. Nor is it clear<br />

if the “prisoners” may actually be dangerous. The aggressors<br />

instigate frequent movement, making their enemies line up,<br />

sit down, march, and move to the exterior of the building,<br />

where they continue to shove, kick, and reprimand. At one<br />

point, there is a sudden reversal of roles and the captives<br />

temporarily take over. As the film continues on a loop,<br />

everyone keeps marching and the guns always seem just<br />

a moment from firing.<br />

Kelly Sidley<br />

From the catalogue: Aernout Mik, The Museum<br />

of Modern Art, New York, 2009<br />

129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!