katalog
katalog
katalog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
АРНАуТ мИК<br />
AERNOUt MiK<br />
128<br />
Aernout Mik’s work seamlessly combines expert filmmaking,<br />
elegant architecture, an understanding of group behavior,<br />
an appreciation of how people move through various types<br />
of space, and a keen sense of social responsibility. It subverts<br />
both notions of art's traditional disciplines and conventional<br />
ways of thinking bout it. Mik sculpts walls in which screens<br />
adhere; or he makes his “freestanding” screens into sculpt-<br />
ural objects that invite their own contemplation from viewers.<br />
In encountering a piece by Mik there are many aspects to<br />
consider: how the images on the screen arrest the viewer<br />
and then how they may be read; the shape, size, and place-<br />
ment of the screen itself; the relationship of the screen to its<br />
frame (if it has one) and certainly to the wall(s) away from<br />
which the screen “stands”; and because the screens frequently<br />
touch the floor and are built lower than the height<br />
of the average person, one also has to consider the other<br />
viewers who come upon, stop, move about and experience<br />
Mik’s work. He assumes, quite rightly, that viewers attend<br />
his pieces with a baggage of information derived from mass<br />
media. His moving images refer to current events—protests,<br />
police actions, reactions to catastrophes—without ever<br />
explaining or specifying them. With sweeping cameras<br />
Mik records what appears to be an event in which there are<br />
separate groups, sometimes co-mingling and absorbing one<br />
into the other, and sometimes remaining apart. An intimation<br />
of impending violence is obtained. But there is no<br />
resolution because there is no drama. In a Mik event things<br />
may happen, but they happen without regard to plot and<br />
with no semblance of beginning, middle or end. Things<br />
happen over a certain period, and then, after a while, they<br />
happen again. Mik’s pieces are time-based, but he cannily<br />
squeezes out the notion of duration from time,making that<br />
particular measure dimensionless. We will consider three<br />
of his most distinctive works. Schoolyard (2009), a two<br />
screen piece, is classic Mik. It stops the unsuspecting<br />
viewer in their tracks.<br />
Describing some disturbance in a vocational school<br />
which is being evacuated, the images suggest a cultural<br />
conflict which may turn brutal. Its large cast is splintered<br />
into various groups choreographed with purpose, but those<br />
purposes are never articulated. Vacuum Room (2005) is<br />
a gallery piece, as required by its architecture. Rear<br />
projectors cast images from surveillance cameras in a<br />
legislative or judicial chamber into which protestors burst,<br />
interrupting a session. The enveloping nature of the piece,<br />
and the idea that the cameras, being surveillance, are fixed<br />
in place and cannot move except on their own axis, make<br />
this work distinctive. Finally, Raw Footage (2006), is in its<br />
conception unlike Mik’s other works. It is edited from unused<br />
newsreel footage shot during the civil war in the Balkans.<br />
Mik took the footage as it came from the camera, both<br />
image and sound (this is the only one of Mik’s pieces with<br />
a track), and edited it into “chapters” or “episodes” with<br />
darkness between incidents. Although Raw Footage uses<br />
documentary material of soldiers and civilians assuming<br />
a normalcy in a time of crises, its actuality indicates how<br />
slippery and strange reality is, affirming with a quiet devastation<br />
the adage “Truth is Stranger than Fiction”.<br />
Laurence Kardish<br />
in Exit 100 Video Artist, Exitmedia, 2010<br />
Pages 122–123 and 126–127:<br />
stills from Scapegoats, 2006<br />
video installation, digital video on hard drive, freestanding screen, 39 minutes<br />
Produced by bak, basis voor actuele kunst and the artist<br />
courtesy carlier | gebauer, berlin<br />
Page 125:<br />
installation view: kunstverein hannover, 2007<br />
Photographer: raimund zakowski<br />
courtesy carlier | gebauer, berlin<br />
Scapegoats, 2006<br />
Scapegoats is set in and around an unspecified sports arena.<br />
Most of the action takes place in a large area at the center<br />
of the complex, which has been transformed into a refugee<br />
camp or holding point of some kind. Stations devoted to<br />
different functions—sleeping, cooking, storage, medical<br />
care—have been loosely organized into zones. Military<br />
operations dominate the entire atmosphere, from combat<br />
trucks parked inside the arena to frequent displays of<br />
weaponry. The people inhabiting the scene can be broken<br />
down into two groups: Those who are in control and those<br />
who must follow orders. Commanders continually line up<br />
their charges, only sometimes allowing them to rest on the<br />
ground with their hands on their heads. An adolescent boy<br />
is given the responsibility of carrying a rifle as he patrols<br />
a group of detainees. At the same time, more prosaic scenes<br />
unfold: a portable stove and cafe tables form a makeshift<br />
canteen and cots provide a place to rest.<br />
The divisions and allegiances between the groups remain<br />
tenuous. The captors wear military-oriented garb, but the<br />
aernout mik was born 1962 in the Netherlands, where he lives and works.since 1995 aernout mik is working with film, video,<br />
photography in order to create laboratory settings which, parallel to the real world, create situations reflecting on the conditions<br />
of humans at work, at play etc. his video installations are a delicate act of balance between staged drama or real event. reconstructing<br />
events on the periphery of our social reality, mik constantly shows scenarios shaped by hierarchy or political domination.<br />
ragtag nature of their clothes does not belie any distinct<br />
political leaning or nationality. The visual similarities<br />
between all of the factions—soldiers, prisoners in uniform,<br />
and those who are partially dressed in both civilian and<br />
military attire—further the confusion and make it impossible<br />
to place people into distinct categories. Nor is it clear<br />
if the “prisoners” may actually be dangerous. The aggressors<br />
instigate frequent movement, making their enemies line up,<br />
sit down, march, and move to the exterior of the building,<br />
where they continue to shove, kick, and reprimand. At one<br />
point, there is a sudden reversal of roles and the captives<br />
temporarily take over. As the film continues on a loop,<br />
everyone keeps marching and the guns always seem just<br />
a moment from firing.<br />
Kelly Sidley<br />
From the catalogue: Aernout Mik, The Museum<br />
of Modern Art, New York, 2009<br />
129