katalog
katalog
katalog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ТИм ечеЛС<br />
tiM EtChELLs<br />
76<br />
Tim Etchells (1962) works in a wide range of formal<br />
contexts spanning performance, fiction, theoretical/<br />
discursive writing and visual art. He is well known as a<br />
founding member and artistic director of the renowned<br />
performance ensemble Forced Entertainment based in<br />
Sheffield, UK. Since its formation in 1984 the group has<br />
been presenting its groundbreaking work around the world<br />
in festivals and contexts dealing with radical developments<br />
in the performing arts. Alongside this collaborative practice,<br />
Etchells has developed a unique voice in writing about key<br />
issues in the field of contemporary performance, notably a<br />
collection of essays and texts, Certain Fragments, published<br />
by Routledge in 1999. Additionally, Etchells published a<br />
short fiction collection Endland Stories in 1999, which was<br />
followed in 2001 by The Dream Dictionary. More recently<br />
he published his first novel, The Broken World (2008), which<br />
takes the form of a guide to an imaginary computer game.<br />
In parallel, Etchells’ visual arts practise has been growing<br />
consistently since 2002, exploring in this arena as well<br />
many of the concerns that have driven him since the start of<br />
his career. Key preoccupations for Etchells across the many<br />
forms he works in are the construction and negotiation of<br />
presence, the dynamic forces of liveness, improvisation,<br />
task and failure. Language itself often features as an<br />
essential element and subject of his work, and the limits<br />
and possibilities of language—as a constructed space and<br />
as a structure for social negotiation—continue to fascinate<br />
him at a deep level.<br />
Indeed, in simple phrases constructed in neon and LED,<br />
as well as in other media from banners to stencils and text<br />
painted straight onto walls, Etchells often uses language to<br />
summon miniature narratives, moments of confusion,<br />
awkwardness, reflection and intimacy. Encountering these<br />
works in the context of a gallery or city street, the viewer is<br />
implicated in a proposition or situation that the text alludes<br />
to, but does not espouse on or reveal fully.<br />
Etchells’ sign works—such as neons Wait Here (2008),<br />
Let’s Pretend (2008), Forever (2010), Please Come Back<br />
(2008) and Fading Glory (2010) presented at the October<br />
Salon, explore ways in which missing information can be<br />
just as important as that which is shown or known through<br />
text. Invoking a situation, or projecting an idea out-of-context,<br />
‘apropos of nothing’, Etchells’ direct-but-puzzling<br />
phrases certainly invite us in, but into what exactly we can<br />
never be entirely sure. Narrative is clearly invoked in these<br />
text works, as many of them suggest a supposed intimate<br />
relationship between their author or their fictional voice<br />
and the implied viewer/reader. Frequently offering specific<br />
advice or demand for action, the details of the scenarios in<br />
which the reader is virtually implicated can however never<br />
be fully inferred from the information supplied. Instead, on<br />
encountering the work, we are co-opted, pulled in as imagi-<br />
native authors and collaborators charged with the task of<br />
fleshing out or unpacking the minimal hints provided by<br />
language. It’s precisely the focus on this act—the act of<br />
collaborative ‘staging’ or performative encountering—that<br />
often links Etchells’ work in visual arts back to the territory<br />
of performance ‘proper’.<br />
In many of Etchells’ sign works, a further tension exists<br />
between the supposed urgency, emotion or narrative drive<br />
of language on the one side, and the elaborate means of the<br />
texts’ display as neon or LED on the other. In Wait Here<br />
(2008) we encounter a text more appropriate for hurried,<br />
heartfelt or handwritten private communication, turned<br />
here into garish public statements. What we might understand<br />
as intimate notes intended to convey danger or regret<br />
become in Etchells’ work luminous pseudo-advertisements<br />
placed in the public space of the city or the gallery. Such<br />
translations of form and context confuse and amplify the<br />
fragmentary and elusive content of the works, altering both<br />
its status and significance, whilst also functioning as subtle<br />
interventions in the city itself through which familiar<br />
locations are made strange.<br />
For October Salon, alongside a selection of existing<br />
neon works, Etchells is creating a new work, Nightlanguage,<br />
pursuing his interest in the structural possibilities and<br />
restrictions of language. Etchells has long been fascinated<br />
by the dynamics between the restrictiveness of a system or<br />
rules and the generative force of language itself—especially<br />
in works such as Nothing List (2006) and Starfucker (2001).<br />
The former consists of a scrolling LED display of words or<br />
phrases which start with the word ‘Nothing’ (Nothing For<br />
You, Nothing to Worry About, Nothing Left, etc.)—turning<br />
the viewer with the shifts of meaning on each phrase and<br />
creating a catalogue of terms and utterances of denial, absence<br />
and negation. Meanwhile, an earlier video work Starfucker<br />
presents an unfolding sequence of phrases—simple white<br />
text on black screen—each describing a Hollywood<br />
celebrity in midst of some extraordinary violent, sexual<br />
or banal situation. Mimicking the ubiquity and the formulaic<br />
nature of celebrity reportage as well as the endless processes<br />
of recycling narrative elements in movie scenarios, Starfucker<br />
is both a kind of complex linguistic rule-based game and an<br />
imaginary movie made without camera and realised in the<br />
mind of the spectator.<br />
In Nightlanguage, using text in the form of signs or<br />
posters displayed in different areas of the exhibition space,<br />
the artist returns to a rule-based game with language, crea-<br />
ting a collection of invented compound words, each begin-<br />
ning with the term ‘night’. Taken together, this partial<br />
dictionary or catalogue of new words, by turns absurd<br />
Pages 70–71:<br />
Nightlanguage, 2010<br />
Text installation<br />
courtesy Tim Etchells<br />
Pages 74–75:<br />
Wait Here, 2008<br />
courtesy Tim Etchells<br />
Pages 78–79:<br />
Fading Glory, 2010<br />
courtesy Tim Etchells<br />
Pages 80–81:<br />
Let’s Pretend, 2008<br />
courtesy Tim Etchells<br />
Tim Etchells was born in 1962 in the Uk, where he lives and works. his work is diverse, moving from a base in performance into<br />
visual art and writing fiction. working across these different media and contexts seems to open up new possibilities and allows<br />
him to approach related ideas again by different routes, hoping to get closer to or maybe further away from the themes and<br />
experiences that interest him—searching for a new perspective.<br />
and clumsy and yet strangely poetic and evocative, stages<br />
a collision between ‘night’ on the one side—with its<br />
contradictory connotations of mystery, darkness, rest, sleep<br />
and dream — and a range of diverse objects, occurrences<br />
and events from daily life on the other side. In Nightlanguage<br />
we are thus asked to imagine such things as nightbreakfast,<br />
nightroads or nightterror, as well as nighthouses, nightvoices<br />
and nightpicnics.<br />
In constructing this incomplete taxonomy of nightthings,<br />
Etchells emphasises the arbitrary construction of language<br />
and its endless possibilities, repeatedly joining words to<br />
make new terms—however plausible or implausible, con-<br />
jurable or elusive the new compounds might be. In another<br />
sense, Etchells invokes and celebrates the power of language<br />
to summon meaning or invoke experience, no matter how<br />
arbitrary its operations on a formal level. Individually and<br />
collectively, the diverse objects, states and events proposed<br />
by Nightlanguage invite the viewer into a place of imagining<br />
—what experience or realities might these new words point<br />
to? What world, aspect of the world or experience might<br />
necessitate their invention? Is the world invoked by each<br />
of these ‘new’ words the same world we currently inhabit?<br />
On one level, each additional word speculatively expands<br />
the frame of the perceptible in our own experience—naming<br />
things, states or events which were previously un-named.<br />
At the same time though, Nightlanguage leaves us guessing,<br />
or wondering… As we encounter each new word construction,<br />
and imagine its possible manifestation and meaning<br />
—we are always aware that this meaning is held in tension<br />
by the highly visible formal frame of Etchells’ project.<br />
Celia Meadow<br />
77