25.03.2013 Views

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy - Hyperbaric Chamber Information ...

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy - Hyperbaric Chamber Information ...

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy - Hyperbaric Chamber Information ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Glassburn<br />

1974 111<br />

Johnson<br />

1974 112<br />

Ward 1974 113<br />

n=17<br />

Comparison therapy original protocol.<br />

Modified protocol: 4,000 rad tumour dose in 10<br />

fractions over five weeks at a rate of 400 rad per<br />

treatment twice weekly. Stage IIIa to IVa: 400 rad<br />

booster dose to the lateral pelvic wall.<br />

Treatment in a monoplace HBO chamber at 3<br />

ATA for 40 minutes.<br />

n=25<br />

Comparison therapy plus HBOT. †<br />

n=23<br />

Comparison therapy plus treatment in a<br />

monoplace HBO chamber at 3 ATA for 30<br />

minutes.<br />

* Abbreviations: ATA = atmosphere absolute, n = sample size.<br />

† <strong>Therapy</strong> not described.<br />

n=23<br />

Original protocol: 250 rad per treatment session,<br />

four times a week, 1,000 rad per week, for a total<br />

of 5,000 rad. Stage IIIa and IIIb: 1,000 rad<br />

booster to lateral pelvic structures.<br />

Modified protocol: 5,000 rad tumour dose in 10<br />

fractions over five weeks at a rate of 200 rad per<br />

treatment five times a week. Stage IIIa to IVa: 500<br />

rad booster dose to the lateral pelvic wall.<br />

n=39<br />

Three groups with a minimum dose of 6,000 rad<br />

in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Stage IIIa: 500 rad<br />

booster dose to the lateral pelvic wall in two<br />

treatments with a single radium application of<br />

3,000 to 4,500 mg-hrs and a maximum rectal<br />

dose of 8,000 rad. Stage IIIb: 6,000 rad minimum<br />

dose with single radium application of 1,500 to<br />

2,000 mg-hrs.<br />

n=22<br />

Two-point tissue doses of 6,000 and 3,950 rad.<br />

Rectal dose of 5,000 rad.<br />

Comparison therapies were not standardised across studies. Most applied overlapping<br />

radiotherapy exposures over a variable number of fractions and duration of therapies.<br />

The subjects were not placed in HBO chambers.<br />

Assessment of heterogeneity<br />

This review does not attempt to arrive at a common effect estimate through statistical<br />

methods due to the inadequacy with which study populations, methodologies, and<br />

intervention and comparison protocols were described. Instead, the results of each study<br />

are described below.<br />

Review of published clinical experience<br />

In the five-year follow-up published by Brady et al, 108 no statistically significant<br />

differences between intervention and comparison groups in terms of disease and<br />

complication-free survival, median duration, and survival proportions at the end of<br />

follow-up (Table 69).<br />

Table 69 Outcomes following treatment for cervical cancer in intervention and comparison groups<br />

(Brady et al). 108<br />

Outcome<br />

Disease and complication free survival (%)<br />

Overall<br />

Stage IIb<br />

Stage IIIb<br />

Stage IVa<br />

Intervention Group<br />

(n = 29)<br />

Comparison Group<br />

(n = 29)<br />

70 <strong>Hyperbaric</strong> oxygen therapy<br />

48.3<br />

64.3<br />

35.7<br />

0.0<br />

Median duration (years) 4.0 2.5<br />

48.3<br />

42.8<br />

53.8<br />

50.0<br />

p<br />

1.0000<br />

0.2556<br />

0.3434<br />

Proportion surviving to 5 years (%) 45.0 46.0 0.9390

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!