Habitat use and population dynamics of the Azure-Winged Magpie ...
Habitat use and population dynamics of the Azure-Winged Magpie ...
Habitat use and population dynamics of the Azure-Winged Magpie ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 3.9 Proportion <strong>of</strong> time spent by Cyanopica cyanus in six main areas plus o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
areas in 2010. O<strong>the</strong>r areas <strong>use</strong>d this year were cliffs <strong>and</strong> hill slopes. ................. 40<br />
Figure 3.10 Number <strong>of</strong> chicks hatched, fledged <strong>and</strong> b<strong>and</strong>ed between 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2010 .......... 47<br />
Figure 3.11 The changes in colony size throughout <strong>the</strong> season for 2007, 2008, 2009 <strong>and</strong><br />
2010. Numbers in columns correspond to <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> adult or fledglings.<br />
Numbers on top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> columns indicate colony size. ......................................... 47<br />
Figure 3.12 Proportion <strong>of</strong> adult birds b<strong>and</strong>ed each year that were-sighted in subsequent<br />
years .................................................................................................................... 48<br />
Figure 3.13 Proportion <strong>of</strong> juvenile birds b<strong>and</strong>ed each year that were re-sighted as<br />
yearlings <strong>and</strong>/ or adults in subsequent years. ...................................................... 49<br />
Figure 3.14 Year-to-year survival probability (φ ± SE) <strong>of</strong> adult <strong>and</strong> juvenile Cyanopica<br />
cyanus. *Non-significant difference between survival <strong>of</strong> adults <strong>and</strong> juveniles<br />
(i.e. <strong>the</strong> 95% Confidence Intervals <strong>of</strong> both groups overlap for that years). ........ 50<br />
Figure 3.15 Year-to-year (2006-2010) re-sighting probability (p ± SE) <strong>of</strong> Cyanopica<br />
cyanus adult <strong>and</strong> juvenile. ................................................................................... 50<br />
Figure 3.16 Number <strong>of</strong> individuals that attempted breeding (including unb<strong>and</strong>ed birds)<br />
between 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2010 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> individuals that successfully<br />
fledged chicks. Regression lines were fitted for each categories, i.e.<br />
individuals that attempted breeding each year <strong>and</strong> breeders that successfully<br />
fledged chicks each year. .................................................................................... 52<br />
Figure 3.17 Proportion <strong>of</strong> breeders which were successful <strong>and</strong> unsuccessful in fledging<br />
chicks (including unb<strong>and</strong>ed birds) between 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2010. .............................. 52<br />
Figure 3.18 Proportion <strong>of</strong> b<strong>and</strong>ed birds present each year that were present in <strong>the</strong> previous<br />
year , <strong>and</strong> present <strong>and</strong> bred in <strong>the</strong> previous year. ................................................ 56<br />
Figure 3.19 Proportion <strong>of</strong> successful breeders from 2007 to 2009 that were present, that<br />
bred, <strong>and</strong> successfully raised chicks in <strong>the</strong> subsequent year ............................... 56<br />
Figure 3.20 Proportion <strong>of</strong> unsuccessful breeders from <strong>the</strong> years 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2009 that were<br />
present, that bred, <strong>and</strong> successfully raised chicks in <strong>the</strong> subsequent year.<br />
There were no recorded unsuccessful breeders in 2007. ..................................... 57<br />
x