03.04.2013 Views

ScienceMakers Toolkit Manual - The History Makers

ScienceMakers Toolkit Manual - The History Makers

ScienceMakers Toolkit Manual - The History Makers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

physics. <strong>The</strong>y would talk particularly about solid state physics. And this has to do with the atomic physics and<br />

the structure that you might fi nd that would be applied to electronics, for example. Traditionally, we call it<br />

condensed matter physics, but solid state physics is the sort of subject matter that’s associated with basically<br />

the electronics industry. So we were thinking at some level about the application of our science to industrial<br />

development, to building things and so forth. And I still have sort of a thought process about building things…<br />

But there came a time when I started to really ask some very fundamental questions about, particularly about<br />

nuclear structure. I didn’t quite understand it, and I began to read and to think more about it and decided that<br />

this might be a reasonable thing for me to start to study. <strong>The</strong> instruments associated with nuclear structure and<br />

the subject itself. So instead of graduating or leaving in three years to study engineering, I decided to stay an<br />

additional year and fi nish my undergraduate thesis work as well as a bachelors, A.B. degree, Bachelor of Arts<br />

degree in physics.<br />

Clip 4 - Transition to Particle Physics: My fi rst research paper that I published had to do with the study of<br />

looking for heavy elements in an environment of bulk light elements. This came out of a study that was motivated<br />

by the concern that people had about mercury in tuna fi sh. So we were looking for trace amounts of heavy<br />

elements in biological materials. So I had already done radioactive materials in soil samples, so this was not<br />

signifi cantly different to some extent. I got to use a cyclotron to do the work, and that was very signifi cantly different,<br />

rather than just counting the activated materials that were coming off soil. So, during this particular year,<br />

I began to study the heavy elements, or trace elements, in various types of biological materials…I had a lot of<br />

fun doing that, and it’s very interesting, cause I learned a great deal about the new techniques of making thin<br />

targets, about using alpha particles scattering from cyclotrons and also about building and performing an experiment<br />

as well as the analysis of it. After that work, I also received an Alfred P. Sloan travel fellowship basically.<br />

It was suggested by what’s now the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. But I received funds to be able to<br />

do work outside of Michigan State University and my mentor, Dr. Henry Blauser, suggested that I take these<br />

funds to the Central European Laboratory for Particle Physics Research in Geneva, Switzerland. And so this<br />

would be the fi rst time that I’d actually gone to Europe and while at CERN, I made the transition, perhaps to the<br />

disappointment of my mentor, from nuclear and accelerator physics into particle physics.<br />

Clip 5 - Difference Between Physics Types: At some level the difference between nuclear physics and particle<br />

physics is designed to be associated with the energy. So in fact, if I’m dealing with particles that are in the range<br />

of millions of electron volts, and I look at the structure of the nucleus of the atom, which means the protons<br />

and neutrons that make up the structure of the atom, I’m doing nuclear physics. If in fact I want to do particle<br />

physics, I have to go to much, much higher energies because you have to have a high-energy beam to be able<br />

to probe not just into the nucleus of the atom, but into the particles that make up the particles of the nucleus of<br />

the atom. And those particles are known as quarks, or partons. So what we do essentially as an “atom smasher,”<br />

so to speak, is that we break apart the structures that hold the nuclear forces that hold the nuclear components<br />

together within an atom, and that is essentially nuclear interactions. And then, we also take some of the individual<br />

particles with high-energy particle beams, and we break up the components that are inside of the protons<br />

and neutrons that are the massive parts of the atomic structure, and we look at the particles that come out. This<br />

is true conversion between the energy that’s in particle beams and the mass that’s equivalent to that energy. <strong>The</strong><br />

E equals MC squared really means something when you’re actually dealing with the production of elementary<br />

particles, because the higher the energy that you’re going to have, the more energy conversion that you can<br />

produce, and in fact the more precision you can have in terms of studying the particles inside of the nuclear<br />

structure.<br />

Clip 6 - Getting more Minority Scientists: If you want to make a scientist that’s even close to being, say, a<br />

high-energy particle physicist, you have to start in the eighth grade. You have to get someone, not necessarily<br />

whether that person is a member of an underrepresented group, but you have to look at the members of underrepresented<br />

groups and say, who’s interested in understanding gravitational lensing, black holes, why the sun<br />

shines, how nuclear structure works, how particles work, CP violation. Anyone who’s interested in doing those<br />

sort of things is the person that you want to support because once you get that particular interest, that you get<br />

209<br />

Physics

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!