04.04.2013 Views

On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin

On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin

On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

esponsible. The witness for example in <strong>the</strong> case being investigated by Parya, in <strong>the</strong><br />

Manki’s court in both <strong>the</strong> cases, did not testify to what <strong>the</strong>y did not see, or do not<br />

know about. A little favouritism by <strong>the</strong> witnesses could change <strong>the</strong> cases decision. But<br />

on <strong>the</strong> contrary <strong>the</strong>y try to bring in more evidences to what <strong>the</strong>y all see it to be right.<br />

But <strong>the</strong> state as <strong>the</strong> outside agency here can testify because ‘it does not see or think by<br />

itself, it does what it is told’ and has a legal status <strong>of</strong> what it is made to do which is<br />

usually not challenged. In this case <strong>the</strong> sales-deed. The document also could be right<br />

if <strong>the</strong> question raised by <strong>the</strong> opponent is answered satisfactorily. In a collective group<br />

trust on one ano<strong>the</strong>r is what binds <strong>the</strong>m; <strong>the</strong>ir relations are less dependent on any<br />

outside ‘authority’ to be approved and certified.<br />

There is also <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> gender equity, which is briefly touched upon in <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

chapter. The gender issue in <strong>the</strong> discussion concluded that in <strong>the</strong> customary system it<br />

is not important through which gender <strong>the</strong> inheritance should be seen, but what was<br />

important in both cases (Adivasis <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand and Khasis <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya) was <strong>the</strong><br />

centrality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community.<br />

Individualism or collectivism is not in opposition with each o<strong>the</strong>r, but only when <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are different interests and intensions associated with <strong>the</strong>m it tends to becomes<br />

problematic. The following case could throw some light on this issue.<br />

5.3 Second step in <strong>the</strong> search <strong>of</strong> a modern benchmark<br />

Beyond <strong>the</strong> level on which <strong>the</strong> customary system <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Adivasis in Jharkhand has<br />

been elaborated, <strong>the</strong>re is a question: could such a system develop to a higher level <strong>of</strong><br />

autonomous functioning in <strong>the</strong> present modern nation-state? If it does develop, what<br />

could one hope from it? Secondly, would <strong>the</strong>re be a need to develop <strong>the</strong> basis on<br />

which <strong>the</strong>se customary systems are founded? This means to search for <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong><br />

that social orientation, perspectives and epistemology which demand an explanation<br />

<strong>of</strong> this system’s structural properties.<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!