04.04.2013 Views

On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin

On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin

On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

independent national’s developments have brought in a new change in presenting <strong>the</strong><br />

Adivasis and <strong>the</strong>ir reality. This new perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>mselves (Adivasis) in <strong>the</strong><br />

administration in <strong>the</strong> hands <strong>of</strong> Indian elite brings in a newer change for <strong>the</strong> Adivasis.<br />

3.3. The state’s political notion and Adivasi<br />

developments after India’s independence<br />

The independent India, now free from <strong>the</strong> colonial rule, was to be governed by <strong>the</strong><br />

new Constitution, led by <strong>the</strong> elected representative from <strong>the</strong> country who had to<br />

choose a model <strong>of</strong> development for this new nation. The question for <strong>the</strong> National<br />

Planning Committee (NPC) set up by <strong>the</strong> Congress Party <strong>the</strong>n was that, from among<br />

<strong>the</strong> two perspectives and approaches <strong>of</strong> development models, which one would<br />

formulate a plan for India’s development, mainly <strong>the</strong> industrialization aiming for <strong>the</strong><br />

nation’s ‘economic regeneration’. Gandhi’s plan had a strong emphasis on smallscale,<br />

cottage industries to be <strong>the</strong> primary units <strong>of</strong> larger industry but was received<br />

with suspicion and criticism in NPC. Nehru, <strong>the</strong> NPC’s chairman, and <strong>the</strong> Prime<br />

Minister <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> independent India had long believed that <strong>the</strong> large-scale<br />

industrialization alone could solve India’s problems <strong>of</strong> poverty and unemployment.<br />

Apart from Nehru’s own beliefs, <strong>the</strong> NPC’s reports on different spheres <strong>of</strong><br />

development reflected <strong>the</strong> vision <strong>of</strong> a powerful and growing class <strong>of</strong> industrialists,<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir supporters in politics and intellectuals with high qualifications in different areas,<br />

including science and technology 94 .<br />

The national policies regarding Adivasi or ‘tribal developments’ that came in <strong>the</strong> fifth<br />

decade after <strong>the</strong> independence started with that <strong>of</strong> Bhoodan (donate land) Movement<br />

in 1951, followed by Community Development Programme in 1952, village housing<br />

scheme in 1957, etc. These were followed by Agricultural District Programmes in <strong>the</strong><br />

following decade in 1960 and <strong>the</strong> Tribal Areas Development Programme in 1962. By<br />

<strong>the</strong> year 2000 one could see that <strong>the</strong>re were over 35 different programs implemented<br />

in <strong>the</strong> ‘Scheduled Areas’ and ‘Tribal Areas’. 95 However, <strong>the</strong> approach in <strong>the</strong><br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se programs for <strong>the</strong> Adivasis in <strong>the</strong>se areas was supposed to be<br />

94<br />

Krishna Kumar, “Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (1869-1948)” Prospects, Vol. 23, 3/4, (1993),<br />

507–517.<br />

95<br />

V.S. Upadhyay and Gaya Pandey, Tribal Development in India (A Critical Appraisal) op. cit., 193.<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!