04.04.2013 Views

On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin

On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin

On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

he is called <strong>the</strong> ‘Lord’ paramount <strong>of</strong> soil was not accepted in its classical form. In Chota<br />

Nagpur <strong>the</strong> land was distributed in <strong>the</strong> community as a whole and <strong>the</strong> proprietary right was<br />

vested in <strong>the</strong> village community.” 55<br />

The practice <strong>of</strong> this customary system in <strong>the</strong> Jharkhand region begins as early as <strong>the</strong><br />

6 th to 10 th century A.D. as investigated by J.C. Jha. He also illustrates several<br />

developments in this system by <strong>the</strong> year 1839 and <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>the</strong>re after. It reads:<br />

“In <strong>the</strong> early middle ages <strong>the</strong>re was no raja ruling over <strong>the</strong> country which was divided<br />

into parhas <strong>of</strong> 15 to 20 or even 25 villages, each under its manki and local mundas. 56<br />

These local leaders probably received no rent but only assistance in war and salami at<br />

festival. 57<br />

There are two main elements to bring forward, which shall give us a basis for<br />

discussion in <strong>the</strong> later chapters. First, despite having different language origins and<br />

ethnicity <strong>the</strong> Mundari group and <strong>the</strong> Kurukh group had agreed to a common<br />

customary system with common idioms. Never<strong>the</strong>less, if compared with <strong>the</strong> non-<br />

Adivasi, Aryan Hindu, or <strong>the</strong> Muslim communities, all Adivasis’ customs are more<br />

homogenous.<br />

Secondly, <strong>the</strong> social position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> members in <strong>the</strong> Adivasi communities was more<br />

horizontal than vertical / hierarchical, whereas <strong>the</strong> non-Adivasi societies and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

social and administrative systems can be observed to be <strong>the</strong> opposite. P.R.N. Roy<br />

notes that <strong>the</strong> proprietary right, is vested in <strong>the</strong> village community, with no ‘lord’ or<br />

‘king’ to rule over <strong>the</strong>m. Land, forests and all livelihood resources were community<br />

centred. Adding to Roy’s statement, my assumption <strong>of</strong> egalitarianism could be<br />

experienced here, both in terms <strong>of</strong> gender and plurality <strong>of</strong> different groups within <strong>the</strong><br />

community.<br />

We may <strong>the</strong>n partly, if not fully, agree to statements that three interviews made:<br />

55<br />

Pandey R.N Roy, Manual <strong>of</strong> Chotanagpur Tenancy Laws, Vol. 2., Allahabad: Rajpal and Company,<br />

1996. xi.<br />

56<br />

Division to Owsley, 29 Aug. 1839, para.3, no 247, Misc. Dispatch Book, G.’s Agent’s <strong>of</strong>fice, Patna<br />

Archives. Para 2. cited by J.C. Jha The Tribal Revolt <strong>of</strong> Chotanagpur (1831-1832). (Patna: KPJRI,<br />

1987),.<br />

57<br />

Ibid.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!