04.04.2013 Views

On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin

On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin

On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tribal policy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colonial and post colonial Indian state [see it] in <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> colonial nationalist discourse.” 109<br />

In his same study <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand’s ‘Politics <strong>of</strong> Development and Identity’ Prakash<br />

highlights <strong>the</strong> issues between <strong>the</strong> ethnic identity (/ies) in <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national<br />

identity. Here can we place <strong>the</strong> “tribe” as an ethnic group and <strong>the</strong> “caste” – as a wider<br />

understanding, <strong>of</strong> national identity, since <strong>the</strong> Indian nation-state is largely a<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> caste based societies where <strong>the</strong> “tribe” is a negligible minority [–<br />

emphasis mine]. Prakash, making references to Nevitte and Kennedy (1986), Smith<br />

(1981), and again Smith (1986), and Barth (1969) and presents that <strong>the</strong> two identities<br />

(ethnic and national or sub-national) can also be differentiated in terms <strong>of</strong> demands<br />

<strong>the</strong>y make on political processes. Largely, national identities (in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand<br />

<strong>the</strong> sub-national identity) might be included to seek statehood, where as ethnic<br />

identities might seek autonomy and adequate representation within <strong>the</strong> existing State.<br />

110 (‘State’ with an upper case here is in reference to political concept <strong>of</strong> a State, and<br />

‘state’ with a lower case is for a state within <strong>the</strong> India, i.e. a province.)<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, Prakash based on Brass’s conception, says that:<br />

“An ethnic identity is <strong>the</strong>refore ‘a subjectively self conscious community that establishes<br />

criteria for inclusion and exclusion from <strong>the</strong> group. This inclusion or exclusion from <strong>the</strong> group<br />

hence, involves explicit or tacit adoption <strong>of</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> endogamy or exogamy as well as a claim<br />

to status and recognition, ei<strong>the</strong>r as a group at least equal to o<strong>the</strong>r groups.’ Thus, ethnicity<br />

emerges as ‘an alternate form <strong>of</strong> social organisation’ but is a contingent and mutable status<br />

that may or may not be articulated in a particular context or time. Fur<strong>the</strong>r on, ethnic groups<br />

may tend to seek a major say in <strong>the</strong> political system in order to protect, preserve and promote<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir interests. This may lead to an ethnic group aspiring for a national status and/or political<br />

recognition, ei<strong>the</strong>r within an existing State or as a new State.” 111<br />

109<br />

Amit Prakash, Jharkhand Politics <strong>of</strong> Development and Identity (New Delhi: Oriental Longman,<br />

2001), xiii.<br />

110<br />

Amit Prakash, Jharkhand Politics <strong>of</strong> Development and Identity (New Delhi: Oriental Longman,<br />

2001), 2-4.<br />

111<br />

Paul R Brass, 1991. Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison. New Delhi: Saga<br />

Publication, 1991), 14 cited by Amit Prakash, Jharkhand Politics <strong>of</strong> Development and Identity, op. cit.,<br />

6-7.<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!