On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin
On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin
On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
colonized. It falls under <strong>the</strong> Wilkinson Rule established in 1837 in Jharkhand while<br />
<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> region managed under <strong>the</strong> CNTA and SPTA.<br />
According to findings <strong>of</strong> Sunder, <strong>the</strong> Kolhan estate <strong>of</strong>fice (West Singhbhum district)<br />
maintains a list <strong>of</strong> 26 “pirs” and has given <strong>the</strong> mankis and mundas “hukuknamas” (a<br />
formal record <strong>of</strong> rights). Up to 1992 <strong>the</strong>y were paid a symbolic stipend (Rs 75-100) in<br />
addition to a revenue commission. The rights and duties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mundas and mankis<br />
include: <strong>the</strong> right to settle waste (which meant no-one went landless for long); <strong>the</strong><br />
right to collect revenue; to arrange for and maintain natural irrigation sources and<br />
fallows; to act as police head for his village/pir and maintain law and order; to engage<br />
in social forestry; to protect protected forests and reserved forests. 135 Wilkinson’s<br />
Rules (1837), still in force for <strong>the</strong> Kolhan, provided for disputes to be settled by local<br />
panchayats, and prohibited lawyers. In <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> Chhotanagpur too, <strong>the</strong> rights and<br />
obligations <strong>of</strong> village headmen are part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> record <strong>of</strong> rights <strong>of</strong> each village under<br />
chapter XV, Sec 127 <strong>of</strong> CNTA. Their duties are similar to that <strong>of</strong> Ho mundas.<br />
However, unlike <strong>the</strong> recognition given to Ho mankis and Santhal parganaits<br />
<strong>the</strong>re is no formal recognition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parha system <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mundas and Oraons. 136 In<br />
my field work, I talked to one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mankis from this region. His statements and two<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cases from his court I have presented as an illustration here.<br />
4.4. The case illustration <strong>of</strong> Shivcharan Parya, <strong>the</strong> Manki <strong>of</strong><br />
Charai Pir:<br />
Shive Charan Parya, is a Manki (chief according to <strong>the</strong> customary system) <strong>of</strong> Charai<br />
Pir in Chaibasa who belongs to <strong>the</strong> Ho Adivasis group in south <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand. He<br />
explains how <strong>the</strong> customary system works and how he has used his position to settle<br />
social and legal disputes within his Pir which includes 28 revenue villages in <strong>the</strong><br />
Singhbhum district <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand. He says, if he is called outside his work area he<br />
goes <strong>the</strong>re as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “teen Manki”. This is a special court based on <strong>the</strong> customary<br />
system including three different Mankis from different Pirs. If <strong>the</strong> member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
community does not accept <strong>the</strong> judgment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Manki he/she makes an appeal to <strong>the</strong><br />
135 ‘Kolhan Ksetra mein Manki/Munda ka Dayitva’, Notice issued by Kolhan Estate Superintendent,<br />
Cited by Nandini Sunder in Economic and Political Weekly, op. cit.<br />
136 Sundar, Nandini. “Custom' and 'democracy' in Jharkhand (Land and identity in Jharkhand)”.<br />
Economic and Political Weekly 40/41 (October 8, 2005): 4430-4434.<br />
86