On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin
On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin
On the Future of Indigenous Traditions - Munin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Munda (a post within <strong>the</strong> customary system) who is not from <strong>the</strong> Ho Adivasi, such as<br />
in my areas in Chhota Modi <strong>the</strong>re is one Nayak.” 138 (Nayaks are non-Adivasis. These<br />
groups have settled with <strong>the</strong> Adivasis for long time, though Adivasis usually don’t<br />
have marriage relations with <strong>the</strong>m but share all o<strong>the</strong>r social benefits).<br />
4.5. Case illustrations <strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong> Manki’s court work<br />
Here is a demonstration <strong>of</strong> two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> disputes over land property within <strong>the</strong><br />
Adivasis community <strong>of</strong> Charai Pir, in Kolhan -south <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand, where Shivcharan<br />
Parya, <strong>the</strong> Manki functionary head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> customary systems, resolves <strong>the</strong> matter in<br />
his court.<br />
4.5.1 The case <strong>of</strong> Soma Deogam vs. Chokro Deogam<br />
In this case everyone was members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ho group in <strong>the</strong> Ilaka Manki’s Social<br />
Customary Court <strong>of</strong> Charai Pir, Kolhan, West Singhbhum in Jharkhand. The case was<br />
a dispute over land property between, Soma Deogam <strong>the</strong> uncle, and Chokro Depgam<br />
<strong>the</strong> nephew. Chokro Deogam took <strong>the</strong> side <strong>of</strong> Laxmi, <strong>the</strong> unmarried daughter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
late Bhugon Deogam, <strong>the</strong> only descendent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family to be <strong>the</strong> rightful owner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
land.<br />
The dispute was over one plot <strong>of</strong> land between two members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> descendents <strong>of</strong><br />
Mugru Deogam. The land rightfully belonged to Bhugon, but Bhugon died leaving<br />
behind his wife, Namsi, and his only daughter Laxmi. After Bhugon’s death, Namsi<br />
was threatened by Soma, her distant bro<strong>the</strong>r in law and for some reason she left her<br />
late husband’s village with her daughter Laxmi to her parents’ village in <strong>the</strong><br />
neighboring district in Orissa state.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> periodical distribution <strong>of</strong> land among <strong>the</strong> family members, Bhugon’s portion <strong>of</strong><br />
land was considered to be ‘land with no claimant from <strong>the</strong>ir lineage’ and <strong>the</strong>refore it<br />
should be distributed among <strong>the</strong> nearest members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family. The villagers also<br />
said that Laxmi, being <strong>the</strong> daughter <strong>of</strong> Bhugon, was living and <strong>the</strong>refore deserved to<br />
get her share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> land.<br />
138 Interview with Shivcharan Parya, Chaibasa.<br />
91