Communist China's Policy of Oppression in East Turkestan

291
Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is "upheld"
with the help of various drawings of some "half ape, half human" creatures
appearing in the media and course books, that is, frankly, by
means of propaganda, is nothing but a tale with no scientific foundation.
Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected scientists
in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for years
and studied Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally concluded, despite
being an evolutionist himself, that there is, in fact, no such family
tree branching out from ape-like creatures to man.
Zuckerman also made an interesting "spectrum of science" ranging
from those he considered scientific to those he considered unscientific.
According to Zuckerman's spectrum, the most "scientific"—that is, depending
on concrete data—fields of science are chemistry and physics.
After them come the biological sciences and then the social sciences. At
the far end of the spectrum, which is the part considered to be most "unscientific,"
are "extra-sensory perception"—concepts such as telepathy
and sixth sense—and finally "human evolution." Zuckerman explains
his reasoning:
We then move right off the register of objective truth into those fields of
presumed biological science, like extrasensory perception or the interpretation
of man's fossil history, where to the faithful [evolutionist] anything
is possible – and where the ardent believer [in evolution] is sometimes
able to believe several contradictory things at the same time. 109
The tale of human evolution boils down to nothing but the prejudiced
interpretations of some fossils unearthed by certain people, who
blindly adhere to their theory.
Harun Yahya - Adnan Oktar