08.04.2013 Views

Parasites and Biliary stones

Parasites and Biliary stones

Parasites and Biliary stones

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ١١٧<br />

Advantages of EPBD:<br />

This procedure has the advantage that it preserves the sphincter. Its<br />

effect on the papillary function was studied using endoscopic manometry<br />

before <strong>and</strong> one week <strong>and</strong> one month after EPBD.<br />

• One week after EPBD: CBD pressure <strong>and</strong> sphincter of Oddi peak<br />

pressure <strong>and</strong> basal pressure were decreased significantly.<br />

• One month after: no serious complications occurred <strong>and</strong> there was at<br />

least partial recovery of papillary function. So EPBD seems to<br />

preserve the papillary function.<br />

ERCP tissue sampling techniques:<br />

(Sato et al., 1997b)<br />

Aspiration cytology:<br />

Pure bile <strong>and</strong> pancreatic juice can be sampled by deep cannulation of<br />

the appropriate duct at ERCP. This is obviously a quick <strong>and</strong> easy way to<br />

obtain specimens, but the results from most studies are relatively<br />

disappointing. In the case of the pancreatic duct, small samples (often less<br />

than 3 mL) are obtained, <strong>and</strong> it may take up to 20 minutes to collect even<br />

this amount (Lee et al., 1998). Intravenous injection of secretin is helpful<br />

in this regard. For collection of samples from the bile or pancreatic ducts,<br />

it is important to ensure that the specimen is free of iodinated contrast, as<br />

this can cause cellular degeneration <strong>and</strong> thus false-negatives (Goodale et<br />

al., 1981). For bile cytology, the sensitivity for diagnosis of cancer is low,<br />

ranging from 6% to 32% (Kerr et al., 1991). Aspiration cytology from<br />

the pancreatic duct seems to be more sensitive for cancer detection<br />

(ranging from 33% to 79%) (Del Favero et al., 1988).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!