08.04.2013 Views

Parasites and Biliary stones

Parasites and Biliary stones

Parasites and Biliary stones

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Choledocholithiasis ٧٥<br />

transpeptidase (GGT) <strong>and</strong> alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were the most<br />

frequent biochemical abnormalities in patients with symptomatic<br />

choledocholithiasis (Anciaux et al., 1986). Serum bilirubin levels may be<br />

markedly elevated depending on whether the obstruction of the bile duct<br />

is complete or incomplete. (Sarli et al., 2000). Most of the studies have<br />

emphasised that laboratory investigations must be used in addition to<br />

other imaging modalities to predict the likelihood of common bile duct<br />

<strong>stones</strong> (Tham et al., 1998).<br />

Imaging Studies:<br />

Several diagnostic modalities are available, <strong>and</strong> these are best<br />

divided into preoperative, intraoperative, <strong>and</strong> postoperative studies. The<br />

latter are used for the diagnosis of retained common bile duct <strong>stones</strong><br />

(D<strong>and</strong>an et al., 2005).<br />

Preoperative studies:<br />

Plain abdominal radiography: A plain film of the upper abdomen may<br />

show radio-opaque calculi. It is uncommon to demonstrate a stone, in the<br />

duct by this technique, failure to demonstrate the presence of gall<strong>stones</strong> is<br />

no way invalidates the diagnosis since 10-15% only of gall<strong>stones</strong> are<br />

radio-opaque (Cuschieri, 2002).<br />

Transabdominal Ultrasonography (TUS): It remains the first line<br />

radiological investigation in patients with suspected CBDS. It has a high<br />

sensitivity of detecting both intrahepatic <strong>and</strong> extrahepatic biliary<br />

dilatation. The sensitivity of TUS compared to endoscopic retrograde<br />

cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in detecting common bile duct<br />

dilatation was 96% (Stott et al., 1991). However, the sensitivity of TUS<br />

in detecting choledocholithiasis is much lower with sensitivities of<br />

between 25% <strong>and</strong> 63% when compared to endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!