Parasites and Biliary stones
Parasites and Biliary stones
Parasites and Biliary stones
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ١٢٥<br />
Unsuccessful extraction: Failure to extract <strong>stones</strong> successfully after<br />
sphincterotomy most commonly occurs because the <strong>stones</strong> are too large.<br />
Stones greater than 15 mm in diameter are usually defined as large, <strong>and</strong><br />
attempts to remove them with a st<strong>and</strong>ard basket can result in basket<br />
impaction (Tompkins, 1997). Alternatively, the <strong>stones</strong> may not be<br />
excessively large, but the intrapancreatic portion of the bile duct may not<br />
be dilated sufficiently to allow passage of the stone (Sherman <strong>and</strong><br />
Lehman, 1999).<br />
Grading for the difficulty of ERCP procedures:<br />
Schutz <strong>and</strong> Abbott (2000) presented a grading system for the<br />
degree of difficulty of ERCP (table 4).<br />
Grade <strong>Biliary</strong> procedures Pancreatic procedure<br />
Grade 1 St<strong>and</strong>ard cholangiogram St<strong>and</strong>ard pancreatogram<br />
Grade 2<br />
Grade 3<br />
Grade 4<br />
Grade 5<br />
<strong>Biliary</strong> sphincterotomy<br />
Removal of 1-2 small <strong>stones</strong><br />
Nasobiliary drain placement<br />
Cholangiogram in Billroth II<br />
<strong>Biliary</strong> cytology<br />
Pancreatic cytology<br />
Multiple or large <strong>stones</strong><br />
Stricture dilation<br />
Common duct stenting<br />
Precut sphincterotomy<br />
Lithotripsy<br />
Intrahepatic therapy<br />
in Billroth II anatomy<br />
Cholangioscopy<br />
Pancreatogram in Billorth<br />
type II<br />
Minor papilla cannulation<br />
All pancreatic therapy<br />
Pancreatoscopy<br />
Table (4): Grading for the difficulty of ERCP procedures (Schutz <strong>and</strong><br />
Abbott, 2000)