08.04.2013 Views

Lung Cancer.pdf

Lung Cancer.pdf

Lung Cancer.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

120 S.G. Swisher<br />

Treatment Options for Locally Advanced<br />

Non–Small Cell <strong>Lung</strong> <strong>Cancer</strong><br />

The first thing to realize when treating patients with locally advanced<br />

NSCLC is that this category includes a wide variety of manifestations of<br />

disease (see the lung cancer staging system, which appears in chapter 1).<br />

Although all these different types of tumors are lumped together as<br />

stage III disease, some tumors within this group are best treated with<br />

surgery, and others are best treated without surgery (Table 7–1). The<br />

critical task from the clinician’s standpoint is to recognize the different<br />

subsets so that appropriate multidisciplinary care can be tailored to the<br />

individual patient.<br />

In deciding how to treat locally advanced NSCLC, it is helpful to consider<br />

the advantages and limitations of each of the conventional modalities<br />

of treatment—surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Surgery<br />

and radiation therapy address primarily local-regional disease, while<br />

chemotherapy treats primarily systemic disease but has some local-regional<br />

effect.<br />

Although surgery is probably more effective than radiation therapy in<br />

controlling local-regional disease, surgery is associated with increased morbidity<br />

and mortality and requires removal of noninvolved lung parenchyma.<br />

The benefit from the increased local-regional control afforded by surgery<br />

must therefore be balanced against the increased morbidity of the operation.<br />

Furthermore, if the disease is advanced, in which case systemic recurrence is<br />

more likely, less emphasis may need to be placed on local-regional control,<br />

and radiation therapy may be preferable to surgery for control of the primary<br />

tumor.<br />

Even though many patients with locally advanced NSCLC have micrometastatic<br />

disease at presentation and ultimately develop metastatic<br />

disease, adequate local-regional control still has an effect on long-term<br />

survival. Kubota et al demonstrated in a randomized trial that patients<br />

with stage III disease treated with chemotherapy alone had far lower survival<br />

rates than patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy<br />

because of the lack of local-regional control (Kubota et al, 1994).<br />

Chemotherapy is aimed primarily at distant disease but in many instances<br />

can help improve local-regional control by sensitizing tumors to<br />

radiation (radiation-sensitizing chemotherapy) or downstaging tumors<br />

prior to surgery. Various studies have demonstrated improved survival<br />

with the addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy (Schaake-Koning<br />

et al, 1992; Dillman et al, 1996; Sause et al, 2000) or surgery (Roth et al,<br />

1998; Rosell et al, 1999).<br />

Stage III disease is heterogeneous because in some subsets within this<br />

group long-term survival is dependent on local-regional control while in<br />

other subsets long-term survival is primarily dependent on control of dis-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!