08.04.2013 Views

Lung Cancer.pdf

Lung Cancer.pdf

Lung Cancer.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nonsurgical Treatment of Non–Small Cell <strong>Lung</strong> <strong>Cancer</strong> 151<br />

plete response rates were 37% in arm 1 and 42% in arm 2. There was a significant<br />

difference in time to in-field progression favoring arm 2 (45% in arm<br />

1 vs 26% in arm 2 at 2 years and 49% in arm 1 vs 30% in arm 2 at 4 years) (P<br />

.009). The median overall survival times were 16.4 months in arm 1 and<br />

15.5 months in arm 2 (P .88). There was no significant survival difference<br />

between the 2 arms at 2 years or 4 years.<br />

RTOG trial 94–10, the results of which were published in 2000, was designed<br />

to compare concomitant versus sequential chemotherapy and thoracic<br />

radiation therapy in patients with inoperable stage II or III NSCLC<br />

with a Karnofsky performance status score higher than 70 and weight loss<br />

less than 5% (Komaki et al, 2000b). In this trial, patients were randomly assigned<br />

to receive sequential chemotherapy and radiation therapy (vinblastine<br />

and cisplatin for 2 cycles followed by 63 Gy in 7 weeks) (arm 1);<br />

chemotherapy (vinblastine and cisplatin) with concurrent once-daily radiation<br />

therapy (63 Gy in 7 weeks) (arm 2); or chemotherapy (oral etoposide<br />

and cisplatin) with concurrent twice-daily radiation therapy (69.6 Gy in 1.2-<br />

Gy twice-daily fractions in 6 weeks) (arm 3). Treatment details are given in<br />

Table 8–7. Radiation therapy was given using conventional techniques<br />

rather than 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy techniques.<br />

Table 8–7. Schema for Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 94–10,<br />

a 3-Arm Phase III Study of Concomitant versus Sequential<br />

Chemotherapy and Thoracic Radiation Therapy for Patients<br />

with Locally Advanced, Inoperable NSCLC<br />

Stratification criteria<br />

Stage: II vs IIIA vs IIIB<br />

Karnofsky performance status 90–100 vs 70–80<br />

Arm 1 (chemotherapy followed by once-daily radiation therapy)<br />

Vinblastine: 5 mg/m2 intravenous bolus weekly for first 5 weeks<br />

Cisplatin: 100 mg/m2 given intravenously over 30–60 minutes, days 1 and 29<br />

Radiation therapy: 63 Gy in 34 daily fractions over 7 weeks (1.8 Gy x 25<br />

fractions, then 2.0 Gy x 9 fractions) beginning day 50<br />

Arm 2 (concurrent chemotherapy and once-daily radiation therapy)<br />

Vinblastine: 5 mg/m2 intravenous bolus weekly for first 5 weeks<br />

Cisplatin: 100 mg/m2 given intravenously over 30–60 minutes, days 1 and 29<br />

Radiation therapy: 63 Gy in 34 daily fractions over 7 weeks (1.8 Gy x 25<br />

fractions, then 2.0 Gy x 9 fractions) beginning day 1<br />

Arm 3 (concurrent chemotherapy and twice-daily radiation therapy)<br />

Etoposide: 50 mg by mouth twice daily x 10 only on radiation therapy days<br />

1–5 and 8–12 (75 mg/day if body surface area 1.7 m2 )<br />

Cisplatin: 50 mg/m2 intravenously over 30–60 minutes on days 1, 8, 29, and 36<br />

Radiation therapy: 69.6 Gy in 58 twice-daily 1.2-Gy fractions (at least 6 hours<br />

apart) over 6 weeks beginning day 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!