08.04.2013 Views

Lung Cancer.pdf

Lung Cancer.pdf

Lung Cancer.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 9–3. Third-Generation-Agent Monotherapy versus Cisplatin plus the Same Monotherapy or an Older-Generation Agent<br />

Study and No. of Response Median 1-Year P for<br />

Treatment Regimen Patients Rate Survival Time Survival Rate Survival<br />

Le Chevalier (1994, 2001)<br />

Phase III Studies<br />

Vinorelbine 206 14%* (P .001) 7.2 months 30% .01*<br />

Cisplatin vindesine 200 19% (P .02) 7.6 months 27% .04†<br />

Cisplatin vinorelbine 206 30% † 9.2 months 35%<br />

Depierre (1994)<br />

Vinorelbine 119 16% 7.4 months NR<br />

Cisplatin vinorelbine 121 43% (P .0001) 7.6 months NR .48<br />

Komiya (2000)<br />

Irinotecan 129 21% 10.6 months 42%<br />

Cisplatin vindesine 126 32% 10.6 months 38%<br />

Cisplatin irinotecan 130 44% (P .0004) 11.5 months 47% .145<br />

Manegold (1997)<br />

Phase II Studies<br />

Gemcitabine 71 18% 6.6 months<br />

Cisplatin etoposide 75 15% 7.6 months<br />

Perng (1997)<br />

Gemcitabine 27 19% 8.5 months<br />

Cisplatin etoposide 26 21% 11.1 months<br />

NR indicates not reported.<br />

* Cisplatin and vinorelbine versus vinorelbine alone.<br />

† Cisplatin and vindesine versus cisplatin and vinorelbine.<br />

Adapted from vol 1 no 4 <strong>Lung</strong> <strong>Cancer</strong>.<br />

166 R. Zinner

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!