08.04.2013 Views

Lung Cancer.pdf

Lung Cancer.pdf

Lung Cancer.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Treatment of Patients with Advanced Non–Small Cell <strong>Lung</strong> <strong>Cancer</strong> 177<br />

Table 9–9. Docetaxel as Second-Line Therapy<br />

Median 1-Year<br />

Study and No. of Response Survival Survival P for<br />

Treatment Regimen Patients Rate Time Rate Survival<br />

(TAX 320) (Fossella, 2000)<br />

Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 125 10.8% 7 months 21% NR<br />

Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 125 6.7% 5.7 months 32% .025*<br />

Vinorelbine or ifosfamide<br />

(TAX 317) (Shepherd, 2000)<br />

123 0.8% 5.6 months 19%<br />

BSC 51 4.9 months 28% .780<br />

Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 BSC 49 6% 5.9 months 19%<br />

BSC 49 4.6 months 12% .010<br />

Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 BSC 55 6% 7.5 months 37%<br />

* For docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide.<br />

In TAX 317, patients were initially randomly assigned to treatment<br />

with docetaxel 100 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks or BSC. Eligibility requirements<br />

included receipt of at least 1 previous platinum-based regimen<br />

and PS score of 0 to 2. Patients who had previously been treated with a<br />

taxane were excluded. The initial docetaxel dose was too toxic as observed<br />

in the first 49 patients treated. The dose was then reduced to 75<br />

mg/m 2 for the rest of the patients. For all patients, treatment with docetaxel<br />

was associated with a survival advantage (P .047). However, this<br />

survival advantage was especially pronounced in patients treated at 75<br />

mg/m 2 , in whom median survival time and 1-year survival rates were<br />

7.5 months and 37%, versus 4.6 months and 11% for BSC (P .01 for<br />

overall survival). In addition, treatment with docetaxel improved quality<br />

of life as compared to BSC.<br />

The TAX 320 study differed from the TAX 317 study in the following<br />

ways: the control arm was either vinorelbine or ifosfamide, determined<br />

by the treating physician; the patients were randomly assigned to either<br />

75 mg/m 2 or 100 mg/m 2 ; and previous paclitaxel exposure was permitted.<br />

Patients who received 75 mg/m 2 had a significantly improved 1-year<br />

survival rate as compared to the rate in patients in both control arms.<br />

Previous paclitaxel exposure did not affect the likelihood of response or<br />

survival. Patients treated at 75 mg/m 2 who had disease that was refractory<br />

to platinum compounds had survival similar to that of patients who<br />

had disease not refractory to platinum compounds. In the 100 mg/m 2<br />

and vinorelbine and ifosfamide treatment groups, there was a trend to-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!