08.04.2013 Views

Lung Cancer.pdf

Lung Cancer.pdf

Lung Cancer.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

230 J.B. Putnam, Jr.<br />

Small-bore catheter drainage with bleomycin or talc sclerotherapy has<br />

also been performed with success (Belani et al, 1998; Marom et al, 1999;<br />

Parulekar et al, 2001).<br />

Chronic Indwelling Pleural Catheter. Between 1994 and 1999, a prospective<br />

randomized trial was conducted at M. D. Anderson and 10 other centers<br />

to compare the effectiveness and safety of an indwelling pleural<br />

catheter (Pleurx) (Figure 12–1) with the effectiveness and safety of a<br />

chest tube and doxycycline sclerosis for treatment of cancer patients<br />

with symptomatic recurrent malignant pleural effusions (Putnam et al,<br />

1999). The potential benefits of catheter-based treatment were outpatient<br />

management, improved quality of life, reduced medical costs, and improved<br />

function.<br />

A total of 144 patients were randomly assigned to either an indwelling<br />

pleural catheter or a chest tube and doxycycline sclerosis. (Talc was not<br />

available at all centers at the time of the study.) For every 2 patients treated<br />

with a pleural catheter, 1 patient was stratified to treatment with a chest<br />

tube and doxycycline sclerosis. Chest tubes were placed with a simple surgical<br />

procedure (Figure 12–2). A modified Borg scale for dyspnea, the dyspnea<br />

component of the Guyatt chronic respiratory questionnaire, and<br />

Karnofsky performance status score were used to compare the 2 groups.<br />

Outcomes measured included control of pleural effusion, length of hospitalization,<br />

morbidity, and survival.<br />

There was no difference between the 2 groups in performance status or<br />

initial dyspnea scores. Median survival was 90 days in both the chest tube<br />

and pleural catheter groups. Patients with lung or breast cancer had a 90day<br />

survival rate of approximately 70%; patients with other cancer types<br />

(as a group) had a 90-day survival rate of less than 40%. After treatment,<br />

both the chest tube and pleural catheter groups showed similar significant<br />

improvements in the Guyatt chronic respiratory questionnaire scores and<br />

had similar morbidity. There were no treatment-related deaths.<br />

Initial treatment success (pleurodesis achieved in the chest tube<br />

group; drainage of effusion and relief of dyspnea in the pleural catheter<br />

group) was achieved in 64% of the patients treated with a chest tube and<br />

sclerosis, compared to 92% of those treated with a chronic indwelling<br />

catheter. Seventy percent of patients treated with a pleural catheter experienced<br />

spontaneous pleurodesis. Seventy-one percent of patients<br />

with a chest tube had pleurodesis, although 28% of these patients developed<br />

a recurrence of their pleural effusion after treatment. The mean<br />

time of hospitalization was shorter in the pleural catheter patients: 1 day<br />

versus 6.5 days.<br />

The Pleurx catheter is ideal for patients with “trapped lung” and for patients<br />

with a chronically recurring pleural effusion without a diagnosis of<br />

malignancy (Figure 12–3). Use of the catheter allows the patient and/or<br />

his or her family to relieve the dyspnea while draining the pleural fluid at

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!