10.04.2013 Views

X-Ray Fluorescence Analytical Techniques - CNSTN : Centre ...

X-Ray Fluorescence Analytical Techniques - CNSTN : Centre ...

X-Ray Fluorescence Analytical Techniques - CNSTN : Centre ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

One of the inherent advantages in TXRF is that one deals with thin samples so the<br />

simple conversion of fluorescent intensities I into concentration data C is applicable, as there<br />

is a linear correlation between I and C. After establishing a calibration curve either from<br />

known multielement standards or by using the fundamental parameters to calculate the<br />

calibration curve theoretically, the conversion of I into C can be immediately performed. The<br />

addition of one element as internal standard of known concentration into the sample is<br />

recommended to improve the accuracy of the results, because in this case geometric and<br />

volumetric errors will cancel. The simple relation to calculate the concentration of the<br />

unknown is given:<br />

I S<br />

= C ; (III.3)<br />

x std<br />

Cx ⋅ ⋅<br />

Sx<br />

Istd<br />

std<br />

Cx: Concentration of unknown, Cstd: Concentration of Standard,<br />

Ix: Intensity of standard, Istd: Intensity of Standard,<br />

Sx: Sensitivity of unknown, Sst: Sensitivity of Standard.<br />

A sample is “thin” if its thickness does not exceed the critical thickness, which about 4<br />

µm for organic tissue, 0.7 µm for mineral powders, and 0.01 µm for metallic smears. Under<br />

the assumption that the matrix absorption for the analyte differs only slightly from that of the<br />

internal standard element, these values can be generally be higher by a factor of 40 – 400. For<br />

the calculation of these values, the standing-wave field was not taken into account. This effect<br />

and the sample self-absorption can lead to contradictory requirements for the sample<br />

thickness.<br />

VI. Influence on Detection Limits<br />

The advantages of excitation in total reflection geometry are listed:<br />

1. Efficient excitation by both, the primary and the reflected beam- the fluorescent signal is<br />

doubled compared to standard excitation geometries 45° incident - 45° emission angle.<br />

2. The spectral background caused by scattering on the substrate is reduced because the<br />

primary radiation scarcely penetrates into the reflector substrate (high reflectivity, low<br />

transmission into the material). The scatter contribution from the sample itself is a<br />

minimum because of the 90 degree condition between incident and scattered radiation<br />

towards the detector.<br />

3. The detector is mounted closely to the sample of small amounts are required. The samples<br />

must be prepared in aware that thin film approximation is applicable. Therefore no<br />

absorption occurs and a linear correlation between intensity and concentration of the<br />

element is valid.<br />

4. Simultaneous multielement determination is possible due to the use of energy dispersive<br />

detectors.<br />

Due to the argument 1 and 2 automatically the peak to background ratio is increased<br />

compared to standard XRF.<br />

Improvements in the detection limits can be expected if the physical parameters<br />

influencing the minimum detection limits are optimised. The generally accepted definition is:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!