VULNERABLE MISSION

Recommendations

Info

THE KING’S ENGLISH IN A TAMIL TONGUE Ross, Bobby Jr. “Church in America Marked by Decline.” The Christian Chronicle 66, no. 2 (February 2009): http://www.christianchronicle.org/ article2158685~Church_in_America_marked_by_decline. ________. “Little Church on the Prairie: God’s Work in Gravelbourg.” The Christian Chronicle 66, no. 8 (August 2009): 19–21. ________. “Thou Shalt Read . . . NIV?” The Christian Chronicle 68, no. 4 (April 2011): 3, 15, http://www.christianchronicle.org/pdf_archive/2011-04.pdf. Royster, Carl H. Churches of Christ in the United States: Inclusive of Her Commonwealth and Territories. Nashville, TN: 21st Century Christian, 2009. Stafford, Tim. “Historian Ahead of His Time.” Christianity Today (February 2007): http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/february/34.87.html. Stanley, Brian. The World Missionary Conference, Edinburgh 1910. Studies in the History of Christian Missions. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009. Thuesen, Peter Johannes. In Discordance with the Scriptures: American Protestant Battles over Translating the Bible. Religion in America series. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Triggestad, Erik. “How Many Church Members in India? Counting isn’t easy.” The Christian Chronicle (February 2003): http://www.christianchronicle.org/ article1521118~How_many_church_members_in_India%3F_Counting_isn’t_easy. Trotter, B. “J. C. Bailey.” In Pressing toward the Mark: An Autobiography. Vol. 2, Going to Preach the Gospel to Every Creature, Among All Nations, in All the World, 371–79. Memphis, TN: privately printed, 1998. Waldron Missions. Bulletin Briefs. http://www.waldronmissions.org/bulletin_ briefs.htm. Wallace, Foy E. A Review of the New Versions. Fort Worth: Foy E. Wallace Jr. Publications, 1973. Walls, Andrew. “Eusebius Tries Again: Reconceiving the Study of Christian History.” International Bulletin of Missionary Research 24, no. 3 (July 2000): 105–8. Weir, Marvin L. “Max Lucado’s Storytelling.” Marvin L. Weir Articles 2001, Articles, http://www.rowlettcoc.org/weir0112.pdf. World Convention. “Profile Table.” Resources. http://www.worldconvention. org/newsite/resources/profiles. Young, Richard Fox. “The Frykenberg Vamsavali: A South Asia Historian’s Geneaology, Personal and Academic, with a Bibliography of His Works.” In India and the Indianness of Christianity: Essays on Understanding—Historical, Theological, and Bibliographical—in Honor of Robert Eric Frykenberg, edited by Richard Fox Young, 1–25. Studies in the History of Christian Missions. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009. 109
Vulnerable Mission: Questions from a Latin American Context greg mcKinzie Vulnerable Mission, as the Alliance for Vulnerable Mission articulates it, comprises important missiological concepts. These concepts are not new to missiology, though they have often been under-practiced. Vulnerable Mission is thus a welcome call to more conscientious and thorough application of sound missiological principles. Yet, at least in the Latin American context, some questions remain as to the universality and absoluteness with which missionaries should apply Vulnerable Mission methods. CLARIFYING THE CONTRAST BETWEEN <strong>VULNERABLE</strong> MIS- SION AND MAINSTREAM MISSIOLOGY The Alliance for Vulnerable Mission (AVM) is promoting a conversation that Christian missionaries can ill afford to ignore. I am grateful that Abilene Christian University, through the initiative of Dr. Chris Flanders, has brought the conversation into the realm of missiological reflection among Churches of Christ. I wish to respond to the proposals of Vulnerable Mission (VM) from my particular location. 1 The reader might triangulate my location with a few key coordinates: I write as an Anglo-American, trained missiologically in an a cappella Church of Christ university, serving as a missionary in urban Peru. From this vantage point, the basic impulse of VM looks beneficial. The AVM homepage states: “Vulnerable mission” may be seen as part of the movement toward contextualization of the Gospel of Jesus, which we regard as the theory of many and the practice of few. We would like to see more people take the risks of contextualization and vulnerability in order to reap the rewards that only come to those who value local resources and invest in local languages. 2 The notion that there is a disconnect between mission theory and practice is plainly true. The bifurcation exists on a variety of levels: academy versus ministry, missiology versus missions, ideals versus realities, goals versus potentialities, and the list goes on. The fundamental issue is how to overcome the divide, and VM is attempting to provide a solution: “VM does not propose different goals than mainstream mission and missiology. We are arguing that the mainstream methods of reaching those goals are not achieving them very well.” 3 To be clear, though, the problem is not that mainstream missiology (just “missiology” hereafter) has failed to provide methodological direction. 4 While there are 1 I restrict my comments to the conference material published in the present issue of Missio Dei, with primary reference to Stan Nussbaum’s article (and his related article “Vulnerable Mission Strategies” in the latest issue of Global Missiology) and secondary reference to other conference papers. 2 Vulnerable Mission, “Alliance for Vulnerable Mission,” http://vulnerablemission.org. 3 Stan Nussbaum, “Vulnerable Mission Strategies vis-à-vis Mainstream Mission and Missiology,” Missio Dei: A Journal of Missional Theology and Praxis 4, no. 1 (February 2013): 70. 4 I do not attempt to delimit mainstream missiology here but assume with VM advocates that common MISSIO DEI 4.1 (FEBRUARY 2013): 110–133
Page 1 and 2:
February 2013 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 1 VUL
Page 3 and 4:
The cover of this issue is adapted
Page 5:
FEBRUARY 2013 EDITORIAL BOARD Execu
Page 8 and 9:
PREFACE TO THE ISSUE Dependency, wh
Page 10 and 11:
MISSIONAL THEOLOGY
Page 12 and 13:
“MISSION IN WEAKNESS AND VULNERAB
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
BIBLIOGRAPHY “MISSION IN WEAKNESS
Page 22 and 23:
Economy of Grace: An Early Christia
Page 24 and 25:
ECONOMY OF GRACE understanding is t
Page 26 and 27:
Economy of Grace in Ephesians ECONO
Page 28 and 29:
ECONOMY OF GRACE This instruction b
Page 30 and 31:
ECONOMY OF GRACE discovery and the
Page 32 and 33:
ECONOMY OF GRACE missionaries must
Page 34 and 35:
Unveiling Empire: Ecclesial Resista
Page 36 and 37:
UNVEILING EMPIRE Of course, in this
Page 38 and 39:
UNVEILING EMPIRE interpreting it, a
Page 40 and 41:
UNVEILING EMPIRE tear the skin from
Page 42 and 43:
UNVEILING EMPIRE curity is made to
Page 44 and 45:
UNVEILING EMPIRE have. As Wendell B
Page 46 and 47:
UNVEILING EMPIRE sions. Paul quite
Page 48 and 49:
UNVEILING EMPIRE Howard-Brook, Wes.
Page 50:
MISSIONAL PRAXIS
Page 53 and 54:
MISSIO DEI 4.1 (FEBRUARY 2013): 51-
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60: MISSIO DEI 4.1 (FEBRUARY 2013): 51-
Page 69 and 70: Vulnerable Mission vis-à-vis Mains
Page 109: MISSIO DEI 4.1 (FEBRUARY 2013): 89-
Page 113 and 114: MISSIO DEI 4.1 (FEBRUARY 2013): 110
Page 135 and 136: Vulnerable Mission in Angola: An In
Page 155 and 156: REFLECTIONS
Page 161 and 162:
MISSIO DEI 4.1 (FEBRUARY 2013): 155
Page 163 and 164:
BOOK REVIEWS
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173:
show all

VULNERABLE MISSION

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?