21.04.2013 Views

PCR Detection of Microbial Pathogens PCR Detection of Microbial ...

PCR Detection of Microbial Pathogens PCR Detection of Microbial ...

PCR Detection of Microbial Pathogens PCR Detection of Microbial ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 Sachse<br />

proteins (66–68), invasion factors (69,70) and various virulence factors (71–73)<br />

being used in <strong>PCR</strong> assays.<br />

Apart from the potential to fine-tune specificity <strong>of</strong> detection as mentioned<br />

above, the most evident advantage from the utilization <strong>of</strong> protein gene-based<br />

<strong>PCR</strong> assays is the concomitant information provided on toxins, surface antigens,<br />

or other virulence markers, as these factors are supposed to be directly<br />

involved in pathogenesis. In this respect, such tests deliver more evidence on a<br />

given microorganism than just confirming its presence in a sample.<br />

2.4. Repetitive Elements<br />

Some microorganisms possess repetitive sequences or insertion elements.<br />

Since these segments are present in multiple copies the idea <strong>of</strong> targeting them<br />

appears straightforward. Indeed, this is a favorable prerequisite for the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> highly sensitive detection methods. In the literature, amplification<br />

assays based on repetitive elements were reported for Coxiella burnetii<br />

(74,75), Mycobacterium bovis (76), the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex<br />

(77–79) Leptospira interrogans (80), and trichinellae (81). In combination<br />

with sequence-specific DNA capture prior to amplification, a detection<br />

limit <strong>of</strong> one mycobacterial genome was attained (79).<br />

3. Efficiency <strong>of</strong> the Amplification Reaction<br />

3.1. Early, Middle, and Late Cycles<br />

DNA amplification by <strong>PCR</strong> is based on a cyclical enzymatic reaction,<br />

where the products (amplicons) <strong>of</strong> the previous cycle are used as substrate<br />

for the subsequent cycle. Thus, in theory, the number <strong>of</strong> target molecules is<br />

expected to increase exponentially, i.e. double, after each cycle. As the efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> the reaction is not 100% in practice, the real amplification curves<br />

are known to deviate from the exponential shape (82–85). The course <strong>of</strong> DNA<br />

amplicon production during 30 cycles in an ideal and a real <strong>PCR</strong> is illustrated<br />

in Fig. 2. The extent <strong>of</strong> deviation from the theoretical product yield is determined<br />

by the efficiency <strong>of</strong> amplification, which can be approx assessed by<br />

Equation 1 (86):<br />

Y (1 ε ) n [Eq.1]<br />

where Y is the amplification yield (expressed as quotient <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> molecules<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>PCR</strong> product and the initial number <strong>of</strong> target molecules), n is the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> cycles, and ε is the mean efficiency <strong>of</strong> all cycles with 0 ≤ ε ≤ 1.<br />

The reaction efficiency may, in principle, assume a different value in each<br />

cycle. The parameters affecting ε include the concentration <strong>of</strong> DNA polymerase,<br />

dNTPs, MgCl 2, DNA template, primers, temperatures <strong>of</strong> denaturation,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!