24.04.2013 Views

Integrated Public Transport Strategy - Worcestershire County Council

Integrated Public Transport Strategy - Worcestershire County Council

Integrated Public Transport Strategy - Worcestershire County Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 27 - Monitoring<br />

292<br />

114π - Questionnaires were completed by all of the above schools in 1998/99, all schools that have ‘Safer Routes’ initiatives will be revisited and pupils will complete a further questionnaire after completion of any<br />

works.<br />

≤ - Questionnaires not undertaken - ‘Hands up’ counts in class used.<br />

≥ - North Bromsgrove High, Parkside Middle, Meadows First and Sidemoor First School’s have been analysed collectively because of their close proximity to each other, i.e. a central grid reference has been used<br />

and accident<br />

statistics have been collected within a 1 mile radius of this point. This eliminates any duplication of accidents. Catshill First and Catshill Middle have also been treated in this way as have Harry Cheshire High, St<br />

Johns Middle and St Johns First.<br />

The Harry Cheshire High 6% 70% 5% 18%<br />

St Johns Middle 2% 75% 1% 21%<br />

St Johns First 1% 48% 1% 50%<br />

North Bromsgrove High 1% 44% 31% 22%<br />

Parkside Middle 1% 76% 3% 19%<br />

Meadows First 0% 62% 1% 35%<br />

Sidemoor First 0% 68% 0% 32%<br />

Lickey End First 0% 50% 0% 50%<br />

Fairfield First 0% 19% 0% 76%<br />

Dodford First 0% 0% 0% 92%<br />

Catshill First 0% 68% 0% 32%<br />

Catshill Middle 2% 44% 14% 39%<br />

Tibberton First 0% 11% 0% 89%<br />

School Current Mode of Travel<br />

Cycle Walk Bus Car<br />

Percentage of car<br />

journeys with only<br />

1 Pupil<br />

44%<br />

24%<br />

63%<br />

29%<br />

37%<br />

60%<br />

56%<br />

81%<br />

54%<br />

41%<br />

69%<br />

51%<br />

62%<br />

No. of Perceived<br />

Walking/Cycling<br />

Dangers<br />

70<br />

41<br />

36<br />

87<br />

101<br />

96<br />

36<br />

45<br />

41<br />

13<br />

-≤<br />

131<br />

32<br />

Number of child<br />

casualties within 1<br />

mile of school<br />

-≥<br />

19≥<br />

-≥<br />

-≥<br />

-≥<br />

7≥<br />

-≥<br />

12<br />

1<br />

1<br />

-≥<br />

8≥<br />

1<br />

Average Before<br />

Speeds<br />

(mph)<br />

38<br />

28<br />

28<br />

27<br />

31<br />

29<br />

29<br />

30<br />

36<br />

20<br />

29<br />

26<br />

31<br />

230<br />

150<br />

80<br />

195<br />

173<br />

195<br />

114<br />

103<br />

58<br />

13<br />

-≤<br />

223<br />

33<br />

Sample<br />

Numbers<br />

Baseline Data - (for reference in the above table)<br />

8) Encourage pro-active schools to develop<br />

initiatives under the guidance of the <strong>County</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong><br />

i) To ensure that all schools throughout the <strong>County</strong><br />

are given guidance and help developing a School<br />

Travel Plan and to complete all schools by 2008.<br />

i) Sustainable <strong>Transport</strong> Unit i) N/A<br />

7) Develop a programme of schools for<br />

implementation across the county based upon<br />

need<br />

ii) Personal Injury Accident Information from Police<br />

ii) N/A<br />

i) To update the strategic assessment on a annual<br />

basis and identify target schools for next year.<br />

i) Education Directorate school travel information<br />

i) See Safer Routes to School section<br />

Objective<br />

Target (Performance Indicator) Source of Data Base Information<br />

SCHOOL TRAVEL PLANS (continued)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!