31.05.2013 Views

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62<br />

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />

THE EDUCATION OF AYN RAND, 1905–1943<br />

is individual. So is all parenthood. So is every creative process.” 59 The<br />

Political Sphere was the opposite of the Creative Sphere and must be<br />

extremely limited in scope lest it destroy individual creativity.<br />

Closely related to the two spheres was Rand’s next dyad, of Active<br />

Man and Passive Man. Even as she set them up as polar opposites, Rand<br />

recognized that “in every one of us there are two opposite principles<br />

fi ghting each other: the instinct of freedom and the instinct of security.”<br />

But both man and societies could be defi ned as either active or<br />

passive, and there was “a strange law in their relationship.” 60 If society<br />

was geared toward the needs of the Passive Man, the Active Man would<br />

be destroyed; yet if society responded to the needs of the Active Man,<br />

he would carry along both Passive Man and all of society as he rose.<br />

Therefore modern humanitarians were caught in a paradox: in restricting<br />

the Active to benefi t the Passive, they undercut their basic goal.<br />

This clash between Active and Passive even structured world history,<br />

according to Rand. When the Active Man was ascendant, civilization<br />

moved forward, only to succumb to the lure of the security needed by<br />

the Passive Man. It was a cycle of light and dark that had continued<br />

for centuries, and now Rand saw another round dawning in America:<br />

“[W]hen a society allows prominence to voices claiming that Individual<br />

Freedom is an evil—the Dark Ages are standing on its threshold. How<br />

many civilizations will have to perish before men realize this?” 61<br />

Active and Passive Man were, at base, variations on the concepts of<br />

creator and the second-hander that underlay Rand’s developing novel.<br />

Now appearing in nonfi ction form, the same ideas gave Rand a class<br />

theory of sorts. She was quick to emphasize that the passive type of man<br />

was not necessarily a member of the working classes or the “so-called<br />

downtrodden.” In fact, working men understood quite well the nature<br />

of individual effort and initiative. The highest concentration of collectivists<br />

would be found in two other classes, Rand ventured: the secondgeneration<br />

millionaires and the Intellectuals. Most intellectuals were<br />

second-raters with a lust for power, she alleged. It was they who had<br />

helped Stalin, while the millionaires helped Hitler, aided by “the lowest<br />

elements” in both cases. She concluded, “Tyrannies come from above<br />

and below. The great middle is the class of Freedom.” 62<br />

Here was the clearest infl uence of the Willkie campaign on her<br />

thinking. Before, Rand had spoken only of the superior man and his<br />

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!