31.05.2013 Views

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

212 WHO IS JOHN GALT? 1957–1968<br />

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />

of some for distribution to others. In its basic outline Rand’s discussion<br />

of rights was similar to her “Textbook of Americanism,” which she had<br />

shared with FEE decades earlier. Now her discussion was much more<br />

sophisticated, grounded in both a developed Objectivist philosophy and<br />

concrete examples taken from history and politics.<br />

Similarly “The Nature of Government” expanded on the noninitiation<br />

principle that Rand had included in “Textbook of Americanism.”<br />

She repeated the idea in Atlas Shrugged and For the New Intellectual,<br />

making it a basic tenet of her ethics: “No man has the right to initiate the<br />

use of physical force against others.” 56 Physical force was a core concern<br />

of Rand’s political philosophy, for she held that rights could only be violated<br />

by physical force. The role of government was to protect individual<br />

rights by establishing a monopoly on the use of physical force. Citizens<br />

would forgo the use of force knowing they would be protected by the<br />

government, itself constrained by objectively defi ned laws. To protect<br />

men from criminals and outside aggressors, the government would<br />

exercise its monopoly through police and armed forces.<br />

Although it sounded straightforward, Rand’s defi nition of force was<br />

nuanced. She defi ned fraud, extortion, and breach of contract as force,<br />

thus enabling government to establish a legal regime that would create<br />

a framework for commerce. Critically, Rand also considered taxation<br />

to be an “initiation of physical force” since it was obtained, ultimately,<br />

“at the point of a gun.” This led her to a radical conclusion: that taxation<br />

itself was immoral. 57 In a separate essay, “Government Financing in<br />

a Free Society,” Rand considered the implications of taxation as force.<br />

In a truly free society, one without taxes, how would the government<br />

have any money to perform its proper functions? She suggested a few<br />

examples, such as a fee tied to each contractual transaction, including<br />

credit transfers, or a government lottery. Such schemes “would not<br />

work today,” Rand emphasized, delegating the details to “the fi eld of the<br />

philosophy of the law.” 58 Though the proper arrangements had yet to<br />

be developed, the basic principles behind voluntary fi nancing were the<br />

only ones compatible with true freedom, she maintained.<br />

Like most of Rand’s books, The Virtue of Selfi shness sold briskly, going<br />

through four editions that totaled more than four hundred thousand<br />

copies in its fi rst four months. It also had an important impact on her<br />

public profi le. At the suggestion of Robert Hessen, a Collective member<br />

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!