31.05.2013 Views

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />

BIG SISTER IS WATCHING YOU 175<br />

triumphal secularism was hopelessly naïve and fundamentally unable to<br />

combat the evils of collectivism. In fact, by criticizing collectivism without<br />

the guidance of religion, Rand’s work verged into the very territory<br />

of absolutism, Chambers maintained. He found Atlas Shrugged marked<br />

by strong fascist elements and ultimately pointing to rule by a “technocratic<br />

elite.” The review was marked by a strong personal animus. Rand’s<br />

writing was “dictatorial” and had a tone of “overriding arrogance”; she<br />

was not suffi ciently feminine, hinted Chambers, speculating that “children<br />

probably irk the author and may make her uneasy.” 14 In a stunning<br />

line, Chambers intoned, “From almost any page of Atlas Shrugged,<br />

a voice can be heard, from painful necessity, commanding: ‘To a gas<br />

chamber—go!’ ” 15 At base it was a clash of two radically different versions<br />

of human nature. Rand’s novel showed mankind, guided by rationality<br />

alone, achieving heroic deeds. Chambers, traumatized by Communism,<br />

saw rational man as a damned and helpless creature trapped in dangerous<br />

utopian fantasies of his own creation.<br />

Chambers was also unsettled by Rand’s godless capitalism, which<br />

might be even worse than godless Communism. Where Rand saw the free<br />

market as an essentially spiritual realm and competition as the meaning<br />

of life itself, Chambers saw only a heartless machine world. In the 1940s<br />

Rand had been one of many intellectuals seeking a plausible grounding<br />

for individual rights and democracy. By the 1950s conservatives<br />

had found an answer in religion. Defi ning Communism as essentially<br />

atheistic, they were able to frame Christianity and capitalism as natural<br />

partners in the fi ght against government regulation. If the two impulses<br />

were paradoxical or contradictory at base, that was the very point, for<br />

conservatives wanted the free market set within an explicitly Christian<br />

society. Only religion could balance the “materialism” of free enterprise,<br />

with the Christian emphasis on charity, humility, and equality blunting<br />

the harsher edges of laissez-faire. But now Rand appeared to be tacking<br />

back to the earlier nineteenth-century vision of Darwinian capitalist<br />

competition, absent the soothing balm of Christian egalitarianism.<br />

Atlas Shrugged represented a fundamental challenge to the new conservative<br />

synthesis, for it argued explicitly that a true morality of capitalism<br />

would be diametrically opposed to Christianity. By spinning out<br />

the logic of capitalism to its ultimate conclusion Atlas Shrugged showcased<br />

the paradox of defending free market capitalism while at the same<br />

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!