31.05.2013 Views

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />

BIG SISTER IS WATCHING YOU 185<br />

seemed “begeistered” or hypnotized by her ideas. Then Peikoff, teaching<br />

an introductory philosophy course as part of his Ph.D., caused a furor<br />

by replacing a unit on Immanuel Kant with a unit on Objectivism.<br />

Rand was embarrassed by the uproar but used the occasion to strike<br />

up a correspondence with Hook. She professed to admire his views<br />

and was clearly interested in establishing a rapport, but he declined<br />

her request to meet. When the two were fi nally introduced in person<br />

at the University of Wisconsin as co-panelists at an ethics symposium,<br />

Hook was unimpressed. He later told Barbara, “It seemed to me that<br />

when I spoke she did not so much as listen as wait for me to cease talking,<br />

in order to resume the thread of what she was saying. At the time<br />

she did not appear very analytical in her responses.” 32 Rand’s desire for<br />

complete agreement with her ideas and her single-minded focus on<br />

consistency were distasteful to Hook.<br />

During this time Rand continued reaching out to professional philosophers,<br />

trading books and brief complimentary letters with Brand<br />

Blanshard, a Yale professor and leading interpreter of Aristotle. Later<br />

she would also connect with the head of the Philosophy Department at<br />

Hobart College, George Walsh, who became a dedicated NBI student in<br />

the late 1960s. 33 But neither had the promise of John Hospers, a young<br />

rising professor with a doctorate from Columbia. Rand and Hospers<br />

met when she spoke at Brooklyn College, where Hospers was teaching.<br />

A specialist in ethics, Hospers was struck by her unusual perspective<br />

and the two spent the night deep in philosophical conversation. When<br />

Hospers relocated to California they corresponded in long letters. He<br />

was smitten by Rand’s work and cried upon reading The Fountainhead.<br />

This appreciation kept him tethered to Rand even as she denigrated<br />

his profession. Hospers found Rand’s blanket condemnation of all modern<br />

philosophers diffi cult to take. He told her, “I see on the students’<br />

faces that it is all beginning to jell in their minds, that the ‘integration—<br />

experience’ is now theirs, thanks to my careful presentation and probing<br />

questions. And then I go home and get a letter from you, for which I AM<br />

very grateful, but in it you condemn all modern philosophy—which<br />

presumably includes everything that I have been laboriously doing<br />

throughout so many of my waking hours.” 34 Still, Hospers found Rand a<br />

stimulating sparring partner. Although they often disagreed, he remembered<br />

that “I wasn’t so concerned with what conclusion we ended up<br />

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!