31.05.2013 Views

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

178<br />

WHO IS JOHN GALT? 1957–1968<br />

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />

“that this current ‘return to religion’ is a most dangerous tendency. . . .<br />

But the alien atheism of Ayn Rand, with its worship of Reason and<br />

of an Elite of Noble, Productive Men, and its contempt of human<br />

beings, the ‘masses,’ is no answer to the Kirks.” 21 Rand’s work accentuated<br />

the sharp differences that still separated libertarians from<br />

conservatives.<br />

As controversy raged in the letters section of National Review, Rand<br />

suffered through her darkest days yet. She sank into a deep depression,<br />

crying nearly every day in the privacy of her apartment. Some form<br />

of letdown was probably inevitable after the long buildup to publication,<br />

and Rand’s continued use of Benzedrine may have further contributed<br />

to her emotional fragility. What she dwelled upon was the painful<br />

absence of intellectual recognition. Rand longed to be publicly hailed<br />

as a major thinker on the American scene. The Collective had satisfi ed<br />

her need to be a teacher and an authority, but it left unquenched her<br />

desire for accolades from intellectual peers. Rand enjoyed being a dominant<br />

fi gure, but she also wanted to admire, to lift her gaze upward like<br />

Howard Roark. Nathan and Alan Greenspan elicited her favor precisely<br />

because they could teach her about psychology and economics, fi elds<br />

about which she knew little. Mises’s endorsement was welcome, but not<br />

enough. She had already counted him among her supporters, and he<br />

held little sway outside libertarian circles. Rand directly confessed her<br />

disappointment only to Frank, Nathan, and Barbara, but her anguish<br />

was palpable to the rest of the Collective.<br />

Rand’s quest for intellectual recognition was doomed from the outset.<br />

It was not simply that her political views were unpopular. Five years<br />

after the publication of Atlas Shrugged Milton Friedman advanced similarly<br />

controversial ideas in his Capitalism and Freedom, with little loss to<br />

his academic reputation. Friedman’s association with the University of<br />

Chicago and his technical work in economics insulated him against the<br />

type of attacks Rand endured. 22 She had neither a formal academic post<br />

nor any academic training beyond her Soviet undergraduate degree. Yet<br />

it was her choice of style rather than form which inhibited her work’s<br />

reception. Rand’s romantic fi ction, with its heavy political messages<br />

and overdrawn contrasts between good and evil, was hopelessly out of<br />

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!