2012 Proceedings - International Tissue Elasticity Conference
2012 Proceedings - International Tissue Elasticity Conference
2012 Proceedings - International Tissue Elasticity Conference
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Session MIP–3: Methods for Imaging Elastic <strong>Tissue</strong> Properties – III<br />
Friday, October 5 10:30A – 12:00P<br />
062 IMAGING TRANSVERSE ISOTROPIC ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF MUSCLE WITH<br />
ULTRASONICALLY TRACKED RADIATION FORCE INDUCED SHEAR WAVES IN 3D.<br />
MH Wang 1 , BC Byram 1 , ML Palmeri 1 , NC Rouze 1 , KR Nightingale 1 .<br />
1 Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.<br />
Background: The mechanical properties of skeletal muscle are consistent with a transverse isotropic<br />
model of elasticity due to the parallel arrangement of thin muscle fibers. As a result, the shear wave<br />
speed (SWS) is fastest along the direction of the fibers and slowest across the fibers. With the recent<br />
availability of 2D matrix array ultrasound transducers, shear wave propagation can now be monitored in<br />
a 3D volume using ultrasound. This overcomes the inherent limitation in determining the fiber<br />
orientation, which is 3D in nature, from 2D cross–sectional images.<br />
Aims: To determine the muscle fiber orientation and SWS along and across the fibers in 3D using<br />
ultrasonically tracked shear waves.<br />
Methods: Shear wave imaging was performed on freshly excised canine muscle embedded in agar. An<br />
annular focused HIFU piston transducer (H–101, Sonic Concepts, Bothell, WA) was used to induce shear<br />
wave propagation with acoustic radiation force. A 2.8MHz 2D matrix array transducer (4Z1C on an<br />
SC2000 scanner, Siemens Healthcare, Ultrasound Business Unit, Mountain View, CA, USA) inserted in<br />
the central opening of the HIFU piston was used for monitoring the resulting shear wave displacement in<br />
3D. The shear wave propagates along the plane of symmetry of the muscle fibers. To determine the<br />
orientation of this plane, the SWS was measured in all possible directions from a single point (the push<br />
focus at 60mm). SWS measurements in directions oblique to the plane of propagation are associated with<br />
high uncertainty. Therefore, the plane orientation containing SWS measurements with the lowest<br />
measurement uncertainty was determined to be the plane of shear wave propagation. The fiber<br />
orientation was estimated by fitting an ellipse to the SWS measured within this plane and finding the<br />
angle of the major axis. To verify the 3D muscle fiber orientation determined from SWS measurements,<br />
high–resolution 3D ultrasound volumes of the samples were obtained using a high frequency 14MHz<br />
1D array (14L5 on the S2000 scanner, Siemens Healthcare) mechanically swept using a translation stage.<br />
The 14L5 B–mode volumes were rigidly registered to the 2D matrix array data using fiducial markers<br />
which were visible in both. To determine the fiber orientation in the 14L5 B–mode volume, 3D line<br />
enhancement filtering was performed followed by a 3D Radon transform (RT). The angle giving the highest<br />
variance in the 3D RT was taken as the fiber orientation.<br />
Results: The SWS measured from a single shear wave acquisition in one muscle sample has been<br />
analyzed to date with on–going accrual. The SWS within the plane of propagation is shown in Figure 1.<br />
The push axis was intentionally made non–perpendicularly to the muscle fibers. The normal of the shear<br />
wave plane of propagation, as determined from SWS measurements, was 26º from the push axis. There<br />
was a 5.8º difference between the angle of this plane and the 3D RT fiber orientation. The difference<br />
between the major axis of the SWS within this plane and the projection of the 3D RT fiber orientation in<br />
this plane was 3º. The difference between the fiber orientation measured from SWS and 3D RT (red and<br />
green arrows in Figure 1) was 6.5º. The length of the major axis (SWS along the fibers) was 5.2m/s, while<br />
the length of the minor axis (SWS across the fibers) was 3.0m/s.<br />
Conclusions: Muscle fiber orientation in 3D and the SWS along and across the fibers can be determined<br />
by monitoring shear wave propagation in 3D with ultrasound.<br />
Acknowledgements: NIH grants R01 EB–002132 and R01 CA142824.<br />
Figure 1: Polar plot of the SWS within the plane of<br />
propagation at the push focus and the<br />
best–fit ellipse. The major and minor<br />
axes of the SWS and the fiber axis from<br />
3D RT are shown by arrows.<br />
indicates Presenter 101