01.06.2013 Views

2012 Proceedings - International Tissue Elasticity Conference

2012 Proceedings - International Tissue Elasticity Conference

2012 Proceedings - International Tissue Elasticity Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

047 IN VIVO MEASUREMENT OF VOLUMETRIC STRAIN FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF<br />

INTRAHEPATIC PRESSURE ALTERATIONS.<br />

Sebastian Hirsch 1 , Thomas J. Kroencke 1 , Jing Guo 1 , Rolf Reiter 1 , Sebastian Papazoglou 1 ,<br />

Ingolf Sack 1 , Jürgen Braun 2 .<br />

1 Radiology Department, 2 Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité–University Medicine Berlin,<br />

Berlin, GERMANY.<br />

Background: Liver cirrhosis often causes portal hypertension which frequently leads to intestinal bleeding<br />

or the buildup of fluid within the abdomen. The distortion of hepatic blood flow due to increased portal<br />

pressure can be treated by Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Stent Shunting (TIPSS). This<br />

intervention creates an artificial channel within the liver that establishes communication between the<br />

inflow portal vein and the outflow hepatic vein. Successful TIPSS can significantly reduce flow obstructions<br />

in the portal area of the liver and therewith reduce portosystemic pressure gradients. In contrast to the<br />

classical assumption that soft tissue is incompressible, recent studies report on poroelastic characteristics<br />

of brain tissue [1,2], thus motivating us to apply compression–sensitive elastography to the human liver.<br />

Aims: TIPSS is not expected to affect the shear modulus of the liver. Instead, the alteration of<br />

intrahepatic pressure conditions may influence mechanical constants related to compression and<br />

pressure. As shown by 3D vector–field MRE of lung [3], volumetric strain is sensitive to different pressure<br />

states of tissue. In this work, we aimed to test the sensitivity of volumetric strain to TIPSS.<br />

Methods: MRE of the liver was performed in 10 patients with liver cirrhosis before and after TIPSS<br />

implantation using a 1.5T MRI scanner with a piezo–electrical vibration generator. The vibration generator<br />

was operated with time–harmonic signals of 25 and 50Hz frequency. 3D vector fields were acquired by<br />

means of a single–shot EPI sequence in 10 transversal slices of 5mm thickness and 2.73x2.73mm² in–plane<br />

resolution. Shear strain and volumetric strain were derived from complex wave fields obtained by Fourier<br />

transformation using the curl and divergence operators based on multi–dimensional gradients [4]. The<br />

magnitudes of the complex oscillatory divergence and the corresponding curl components were averaged<br />

within the entire liver considering the 5 most central slices.<br />

Results: On average, TIPSS reduced the portal pressure by 11.0±2.8mmHg. This pressure change was not<br />

translated to the shear modulus (5.5±2.4kPa prior to the intervention and 4.9±2.2kPa post treatment,<br />

P=0.46). Shear strain given by the rms of curl components was not significantly altered either (0.13±0.05% vs.<br />

0.12±0.05%, P=0.28). In contrast, volumetric strain showed a significant correlation with TIPSS treatment.<br />

The divergence of the harmonic field increased in all 10 patients from mean values of 0.028±0.011% to<br />

0.033±0.014% (P=0.00064), prior and post intervention, respectively. Figure 1 demonstrates the display of<br />

shear strain and volumetric strain in a patient and displays the alteration of volumetric strain in both groups.<br />

Conclusions: Volumetric strain is sensitive to the change in hepatic pressure due to TIPSS treatment.<br />

The observed reciprocal correlation of volumetric strain with pressure is opposed to the reported increase<br />

of volumetric strain in the lungs upon inhalation [3]. This inverse behavior may indicate the intrinsically<br />

different nature of pressure development in lung and liver. While lung pressure can be modeled by an<br />

air–cavity phantom under external load [3], intrahepatic pressure is communicated by the vascular tree<br />

which obeys complex autoregulatory mechanisms [5].<br />

References:<br />

[1] Klatt et al.: Proc. 10th ITEC, Arlington, Texas, p. 115, 2011.<br />

[2] Mcgarry et al.: Proc. of the 20th <strong>Conference</strong> of the ISMRM, Melbourne, p. 2519, <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

[3] Hirsch et al.: Magn Reson Med, doi:10.1002/mrm.24294, <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

[4] Anderssen & Hegland: Math Comput, 68, pp. 1121–1141, 1999.<br />

[5] Roadbard: Am Heart J, 65, pp. 648–655, 1963.<br />

a) shear strain (pre TIPPS) shear strain (post TIPPS) b) vol. strain (pre TIPPS) vol. strain (post TIPPS) c)<br />

x10-3 x10-3 2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Figure 1: Shear strain and volumetric strain at 50Hz harmonic excitation in human liver. Two stages were examined, once with hepatic<br />

hypertension due to flow obstruction in the portal vein and a second time after TIPSS implantation leading to a reduction of<br />

hepatic pressure. While shear strain is not altered due to TIPSS (a), volumetric strain is significantly higher in post–TIPPS patients<br />

indicating a higher compressibility of liver tissue (b). TIPSS–induced increase in volumetric strain was observed in all patients (c).<br />

indicates Presenter 53<br />

x10-3 x10-3 0.8<br />

4<br />

3<br />

0.4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

vol. strain<br />

x10 -4<br />

1<br />

0<br />

pre post<br />

TIPSS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!