01.06.2013 Views

2012 Proceedings - International Tissue Elasticity Conference

2012 Proceedings - International Tissue Elasticity Conference

2012 Proceedings - International Tissue Elasticity Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

065 NON–INVASIVE MECHANICAL STRENGTH MONITORING OF VASCULAR GRAFT DURING<br />

BABOON CELL CO–CULTURE USING ULTRASOUND ELASTICITY IMAGING.<br />

D Dutta 1 , KW Lee 2 , RA Allen 2 , Y Wang 2,4 , J Brigham 3 , K Kim 1,2,4 – Presented by JM Rubin .<br />

1 Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;<br />

2 Bioengineering Department, 3 Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, 4 McGowan<br />

Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.<br />

Background: Mechanical strength is a key design factor in engineered vascular grafts for maintaining high<br />

burst pressure while preserving compliance of the native vessels. To date, most assessments are made<br />

invasively at the end of cell culture; hence, such measurements cannot be correlated with cell growth.<br />

Aims: The aim of this study is to monitor the compliance of a polymer–based vascular graft as fibroblast<br />

and smooth muscle cells (SMC) grow on it using non–invasive ultrasound (US) elasticity imaging (UEI).<br />

Methods: Fibroblasts and SMCs isolated from baboon artery were co–cultured on a porous tubular graft<br />

inside a bioreactor. The graft was fabricated from a biodegradable elastomer [1]. Flow of cells was<br />

maintained using a pulsatile pump, and the pressure was recorded. At the end of days 0, 6 and 13, US<br />

radiofrequency frames were captured over one complete pump cycle, and 2D phase–sensitive speckle<br />

tracking was applied to estimate the displacement field, from which the average compliance of the graft<br />

was determined. Using this average compliance, and the geometry obtained via B–scan, a finite element<br />

(FE) model of the scaffold was created and solved for the experimentally observed pressure conditions.<br />

Direct mechanical pressure–diameter test using laser micrometer was also performed, and the results<br />

were compared to US speckle tracking results.<br />

Results: Axial displacement maps indicating overall distensions of the graft wall are shown superimposed<br />

on B–scan images in Figure (a).<br />

Average compliance of the graft at<br />

the end of days 0, 6 and 13 are<br />

plotted in Figure (b). The FE<br />

displacement field in Figure (c)<br />

qualitatively matches with the<br />

displacement field obtained via US<br />

speckle tracking thereby confirming<br />

that the average compliance value is<br />

representative of the overall<br />

mechanical strength of the graft. The<br />

average compliance of the graft (in<br />

%/100mmHg) after days 6 and 13<br />

was found to be 52 and 22.5,<br />

respectively, through direct<br />

mechanical pressure–diameter tests,<br />

which matched closely with the<br />

speckle tracking results (50 and<br />

20.2, respectively, as presented in<br />

Figure (b)).<br />

Conclusions: The feasibility of non–invasively monitoring the compliance of a vascular graft with cell<br />

growth via UEI is demonstrated. The stiffness increase with multiplication of flibroblasts and SMC agrees<br />

well with the mechanical measurements and previous scientific observations. An inverse problem<br />

formulation to obtain the compliance distribution in the graft is underway that will help correlate any<br />

non–uniformity in graft compliance with non–uniform cell growth.<br />

Acknowledgements: This study was supported in part by NIH 1R21EB013353–01 (PI: Kim). Small animal imaging<br />

system (Vevo2100) was supported through NIH 1S10RR027383–01 (PI: Kim).<br />

References:<br />

[1] Lee KW, Stolz DB, Wang Y: Substantial Expression of Mature Elastin in Arterial Constructs. Proc Natl Acad Sci<br />

USA, 108, pp. 2705–10, 2011.<br />

76<br />

indicates Presenter

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!