03.06.2013 Views

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 Chapter 1. Gauging the Central Charge<br />

The commutator of two covariant derivatives involves the field strength F I µν,<br />

which is given by<br />

and which satisfies the Bianchi identity<br />

[ Dµ , Dν ] = F I µν δI , (1.17)<br />

F I µν = ∂ µA I ν − ∂ νA I µ − A J µA K ν fJK I , (1.18)<br />

ε µνρσ D νF I ρσ = 0 . (1.19)<br />

The field strength is a tensor that also transforms in the adjoint representation of the<br />

Lie algebra G,<br />

∆ g (C) F I µν = −C J fJK I F K µν . (1.20)<br />

Hence, in the abelian case the field strength is gauge invariant.<br />

In [5] Grimm et al. have shown how to embed 1-form gauge fields into N = 2 supersymmetry<br />

multiplets. Let us first discuss the case <strong>with</strong>out an explicit central charge,<br />

δz = 0. In analogy to eq. (1.16) one extends the flat supercovariant derivatives D i α to<br />

super- and gaugecovariant derivatives D i α and imposes constraints on the field strengths<br />

such that only a minimal number of components survives. The Bianchi identities then<br />

fix the algebra to read<br />

{D i α , D j<br />

β } = εαβε ij ¯ φ I δI<br />

{ ¯ D ˙αi , ¯ D ˙ βj } = ε ˙α ˙ β ε ij φ I δI<br />

{D i α , ¯ D ˙αj} = −iδ i jσ µ<br />

α ˙α Dµ<br />

[ D i α , Dµ ] = i<br />

2 (σµ ¯ D i ¯ φ I )α δI<br />

[ ¯ D ˙αi , Dµ ] = i<br />

2 (Diφ I σµ) ˙α δI .<br />

(1.21)<br />

The generators δI act trivially on the supercovariant derivatives, i.e. they commute.<br />

We do not give the explicit realization of the D i α as in the following we need only<br />

their commutation relations. The calligraphic D i α shall always generate supersymmetry<br />

transformations of component fields, and we remark that the relations (1.11) and (1.12)<br />

apply also to the present case when the D i α are replaced by D i α.<br />

The so-called vector superfields φ I transform as tensors in the adjoint representation<br />

under gauge transformations. The Bianchi identities imply that they are subject to<br />

constraints<br />

¯D ˙αiφ I = 0 = D i α ¯ φ I , D (i D j) φ I = ¯ D (i ¯ D j) ¯ φ I , (1.22)<br />

which lead to the field content of a complex scalar, a doublet of Weyl spinors, a real<br />

SU(2) triplet of auxiliary scalars and a real antisymmetric tensor 1 ,<br />

φ I | , χ iI<br />

α = D i αφ I | , D ijI = 1<br />

2 D(i D j) φ I |<br />

F I µν = 1<br />

4 (Di σµνDiφ I − ¯ Di¯σµν ¯ D i ¯ φ I )| ,<br />

(1.23)<br />

the latter providing the field strength for the gauge potentials A I µ. Here and henceforth<br />

we shall employ the convention of labeling a superfield and its lowest component by the<br />

1 A bar denotes projection to the lowest component of a superfield by setting θ = ¯ θ = 0.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!