N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions
N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions
N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
66 Chapter 4. The Nonlinear Case<br />
where for consistency the fermions contained in the composite fields W µ and Gµν have<br />
to be set to zero. The latter depends on the former according to eq. (4.21), so we first<br />
replace Gµν,<br />
− 1<br />
4 GµνGµν + 4AµWν + 2εµνρσ ∂ ρ (LA σ ) =<br />
= − 1<br />
4 V µν Vµν − ˜ V µν ∂µ(LAν) − LWµ ˜ F µν Aν + A µ W ν A[µWν] .<br />
Then the terms linear in W µ cancel, while the bilinear ones combine into W µ KµνW ν<br />
just as for the linear vector-tensor multiplet,<br />
<br />
1<br />
LnlinVT ϱL<br />
2 |Z|2∂ µ L ∂µL + EU 2 − 1<br />
2 W µ KµνW ν − 1<br />
4 V µν Vµν − 1<br />
4 L ˜ F µν Vµν<br />
+ 1<br />
12 L2F µν Fµν − 1<br />
6 L2 (Z ¯ Z + ¯ ZZ) − 1<br />
12 L2 Y ij <br />
Yij<br />
+ ϱ<br />
6 ∂µ<br />
3 µν<br />
2L F Aν − 3L 2 <br />
V ˜ µν<br />
Aν .<br />
(4.47)<br />
Again the nonpolynomial interactions arise from inverting Kµν. Using eqs. (3.38) and<br />
(4.29), the substitution of W µ gives<br />
− ϱ<br />
2 L W µ KµνW ν = − ϱ<br />
2L (LKµρWρ) (K −1 )µν (LK νσ Wσ)<br />
= − ϱ µ 1 H − 2 2LE<br />
˜ V µν Vν + 1<br />
2L2F ˜µν Aν + (LV µν + Π µν )Aν<br />
ϱ<br />
+<br />
2LE|Z| 2<br />
<br />
AµH µ − 1<br />
2Aµ ˜ V µν 2 Vν .<br />
2<br />
(4.48)<br />
At last, let us neglect also fluctuations of the scalars around their background values<br />
〈Z〉 = i and 〈L〉 = 1/ϱ. Then only the gauge potentials Vµ, Bµν and Aµ remain, and<br />
after rescaling<br />
Aµ → gzAµ , Bµν → Bµν/ϱ ,<br />
such that both fields have canonical dimension 1, we find 2 (dropping a total derivative)<br />
L = − 1<br />
4 V µν Vµν − 1 2<br />
1 − g<br />
4<br />
z/3ϱ 2 F µν Fµν<br />
− 1 µ 1 H − 2 2E<br />
ϱ ˜ V µν Vν + gzV µν Aν + 1<br />
2ϱ−1g 2 z ˜ F µν Aν<br />
<br />
AµH µ − 1<br />
2ϱAµ ˜ V µν 2 Vν .<br />
+ g2 z<br />
2E<br />
2<br />
(4.49)<br />
Apart from the normalisation of Aµ, this Lagrangian follows from the one in eq. (3.64),<br />
when in the latter we make the substitution<br />
H µ → H µ − 1<br />
2 ϱ ˜ V µν Vν + 1<br />
2 ϱ−1 g 2 z ˜ F µν Aν , (4.50)<br />
2 Evidently, positivity of the kinetic energies requires 3ϱ 2 > g 2 z.