N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions
N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions
N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.1. The <strong>N=2</strong> Supersymmetry Algebra 7<br />
same symbol. As we are going to deal <strong>with</strong> up to three multiplets simultaneously and<br />
introduce a fair amount of abbreviations, a large number of symbols is needed, which<br />
calls for an economical notation. It should be clear in each equation which is which;<br />
when ambiguities might occur, we explicitly state whether the full superfield or merely<br />
a component field is meant.<br />
From eq. (1.11) and the algebra (1.21) one derives the supersymmetry transformations<br />
of the tensor components of φ I . The action of D i α is found to be<br />
D i αφ I = χ iI<br />
α , D i α ¯ φ I = 0<br />
D i α χjI<br />
β = εαβ D ijI + ε ij F I µν σ µν 1<br />
αβ + 2εαβε ij φ J φ¯ K<br />
fJK I , D i α ¯χjI<br />
˙α = iεij Dα ˙α ¯ φ I<br />
D i αD jkI = iε i(j (Dα ˙α ¯χk) ˙αI + iχ k)J<br />
α ¯ φ K fJK I ) (1.24)<br />
D i αF I µν = i D[µ(σν] ¯χiI )α<br />
while the action of ¯ D ˙αi is readily obtained by complex conjugation. Since the gauge<br />
fields AI µ do not occur linearly and undifferentiated in a θ-expansion of the φI , their<br />
supersymmetry transformations cannot be derived from eq. (1.11). We define the action<br />
of Di α on AI µ by<br />
D i αA I µ = i<br />
2 (σµ ¯χiI )α , (1.25)<br />
which is compatible <strong>with</strong> the transformation of F I µν. Then the supersymmetry algebra<br />
reads on all component fields<br />
{D i α , ¯ D ˙αj} = −iδ i j σ µ<br />
α ˙α<br />
∂µ + ∆ g (Aµ) <br />
{D i α , D j<br />
β } = εαβ ε ij ∆ g ( ¯ φ) { ¯ D ˙αi , ¯ D ˙ βj } = ε ˙α ˙ β εij∆ g (φ) .<br />
(1.26)<br />
On tensors the combination ∂µ + ∆ g (Aµ) is just the covariant derivative. We conclude<br />
that the commutator of two supersymmetry transformations yields a translation and a<br />
field dependent gauge transformation,<br />
<strong>with</strong> parameters<br />
[ ∆(ξ) , ∆(ζ) ] = ɛ µ ∂µ + ∆ g (C) , (1.27)<br />
ɛ µ = i(ζiσ µ ¯ ξ i − ξiσ µ ¯ ζ i ) , C I = ɛ µ A I µ − ξiζ i ¯ φ I + ¯ ξ i ¯ ζi φ I . (1.28)<br />
Now let us compare the anticommutator of two spinor derivatives in eqs. (1.9) (substituting<br />
δz for ∂z = ∂¯z) and (1.21). Evidently, an operator δz generating a rigid central<br />
charge transformation may formally be incorporated into the latter algebra by first extending<br />
the gauge group by an extra U(1) factor, the generator of which one identifies<br />
<strong>with</strong> δz, and then replacing the corresponding superfield <strong>with</strong> the constant background<br />
value i. Accordingly, the central charge is promoted to a local transformation by reintroducing<br />
the full vector superfield, denoted in the following by Z. This differs from<br />
the other φ I in that it has a nonvanishing vacuum expectation value (vev),<br />
〈Z〉 = i . (1.29)