03.06.2013 Views

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.1. The <strong>N=2</strong> Supersymmetry Algebra 7<br />

same symbol. As we are going to deal <strong>with</strong> up to three multiplets simultaneously and<br />

introduce a fair amount of abbreviations, a large number of symbols is needed, which<br />

calls for an economical notation. It should be clear in each equation which is which;<br />

when ambiguities might occur, we explicitly state whether the full superfield or merely<br />

a component field is meant.<br />

From eq. (1.11) and the algebra (1.21) one derives the supersymmetry transformations<br />

of the tensor components of φ I . The action of D i α is found to be<br />

D i αφ I = χ iI<br />

α , D i α ¯ φ I = 0<br />

D i α χjI<br />

β = εαβ D ijI + ε ij F I µν σ µν 1<br />

αβ + 2εαβε ij φ J φ¯ K<br />

fJK I , D i α ¯χjI<br />

˙α = iεij Dα ˙α ¯ φ I<br />

D i αD jkI = iε i(j (Dα ˙α ¯χk) ˙αI + iχ k)J<br />

α ¯ φ K fJK I ) (1.24)<br />

D i αF I µν = i D[µ(σν] ¯χiI )α<br />

while the action of ¯ D ˙αi is readily obtained by complex conjugation. Since the gauge<br />

fields AI µ do not occur linearly and undifferentiated in a θ-expansion of the φI , their<br />

supersymmetry transformations cannot be derived from eq. (1.11). We define the action<br />

of Di α on AI µ by<br />

D i αA I µ = i<br />

2 (σµ ¯χiI )α , (1.25)<br />

which is compatible <strong>with</strong> the transformation of F I µν. Then the supersymmetry algebra<br />

reads on all component fields<br />

{D i α , ¯ D ˙αj} = −iδ i j σ µ<br />

α ˙α<br />

∂µ + ∆ g (Aµ) <br />

{D i α , D j<br />

β } = εαβ ε ij ∆ g ( ¯ φ) { ¯ D ˙αi , ¯ D ˙ βj } = ε ˙α ˙ β εij∆ g (φ) .<br />

(1.26)<br />

On tensors the combination ∂µ + ∆ g (Aµ) is just the covariant derivative. We conclude<br />

that the commutator of two supersymmetry transformations yields a translation and a<br />

field dependent gauge transformation,<br />

<strong>with</strong> parameters<br />

[ ∆(ξ) , ∆(ζ) ] = ɛ µ ∂µ + ∆ g (C) , (1.27)<br />

ɛ µ = i(ζiσ µ ¯ ξ i − ξiσ µ ¯ ζ i ) , C I = ɛ µ A I µ − ξiζ i ¯ φ I + ¯ ξ i ¯ ζi φ I . (1.28)<br />

Now let us compare the anticommutator of two spinor derivatives in eqs. (1.9) (substituting<br />

δz for ∂z = ∂¯z) and (1.21). Evidently, an operator δz generating a rigid central<br />

charge transformation may formally be incorporated into the latter algebra by first extending<br />

the gauge group by an extra U(1) factor, the generator of which one identifies<br />

<strong>with</strong> δz, and then replacing the corresponding superfield <strong>with</strong> the constant background<br />

value i. Accordingly, the central charge is promoted to a local transformation by reintroducing<br />

the full vector superfield, denoted in the following by Z. This differs from<br />

the other φ I in that it has a nonvanishing vacuum expectation value (vev),<br />

〈Z〉 = i . (1.29)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!