03.06.2013 Views

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2. Consistent Deformations 23<br />

Using eqs. (2.26) and (2.28), this gives<br />

0 = iε kj (iεβγ ¯ Z δzψ i α + D i αGβγ) + iεβγ D i αM jk − εαβε ij Z¯ δzψ k γ + i α ↔ j <br />

β .<br />

Symmetrizing in ijk, we obtain our first consistency condition (the second equation<br />

being the complex conjugate of the first),<br />

D (i<br />

α M jk) = 0 , ¯ D (i<br />

˙α ¯ M jk) = 0 . (C.1)<br />

Only such deformations M ij that obey this condition can be taken into account. In<br />

the following we will assume M ij to satisfy eq. (C.1).<br />

If we symmetrize in the spinor indices αβγ, we find that the spin-3/2 part of D i αGβγ<br />

vanishes. This must be so as the maximum helicity in nongravitational theories is ±1.<br />

The remaining components all involve D αi Gαβ. Thus we can express the action of D i α<br />

on the self-dual part of Gµν through δzψ i and M ij . We find<br />

Now we consider<br />

D i αGβγ = −2 εα(β<br />

{D i α , ¯ D j<br />

˙α } ψk β<br />

<br />

iZ¯ δzψ i − 1DjM<br />

ij<br />

3 γ) . (2.29)<br />

!<br />

= iε ij Dα ˙αψ k β .<br />

With the supersymmetry transformations of ψ i as above and using [ D i α , Dβ ˙α ]L =<br />

−iεαβ ¯ λ i ˙αU, this can be written as<br />

0 = iε kj (Dβ ˙αψ i α + εαβ ¯ λ i ˙αU − D i αWβ ˙α) − iε ik ¯ D j<br />

˙α Gαβ − iε ij Dα ˙αψ k β<br />

+ iεαβ ε ik ( ¯ λ j<br />

˙α U + i ¯ Z δz ¯ ψ j<br />

˙α ) + Di αN jk<br />

β ˙α + iεαβ ¯ D j<br />

˙α M ik .<br />

We decompose the equation into parts which are symmetric and antisymmetric in the<br />

indices αβ, respectively. Let us consider the former: symmetrized in ijk it provides us<br />

<strong>with</strong> a second consistency condition,<br />

D (i jk)<br />

(βN α) ˙α = 0 , ¯ D (i<br />

( ˙ β<br />

jk)<br />

N ˙α)α = 0 . (C.2)<br />

The remaining components determine the action of ¯ D i ˙α on Gαβ, of which we give the<br />

complex conjugate expression,<br />

D i α ¯ G ˙α β ˙ = 2 D ¯i α( ˙α ψ ˙β) − 2<br />

3i ¯ Dj( β˙ N ij<br />

˙α)α , (2.30)<br />

and supply the relation D i (α W β) ˙α = 1<br />

2 ¯ D i ˙αGαβ. From the part antisymmetric in αβ follows<br />

first of all a relation between M ij and N ij<br />

α ˙α<br />

, which is a third consistency condition,<br />

¯D (i<br />

˙α M jk) = i<br />

2 Dα(iN jk)<br />

α ˙α , D(i α ¯ M jk) = i<br />

2 ¯ D ˙α(i N jk)<br />

α ˙α . (C.3)<br />

Moreover, we obtain the central charge transformation of ¯ ψi and thus of ψ i ,<br />

Zδzψ i α = i Dα ˙α ¯ ψ ˙αi − iλ i αU + i<br />

3 Dαj ¯ M ij − 1<br />

3 ¯ D ˙α j N ij<br />

α ˙α<br />

¯Zδz ¯ ψ i ˙α = iDα ˙αψ αi + i ¯ λ i ˙αU − i<br />

3 ¯ D ˙αjM ij + 1<br />

3 Dα j N ij<br />

α ˙α ,<br />

(2.31)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!