03.06.2013 Views

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14 Chapter 1. Gauging the Central Charge<br />

We observe that the terms in the second line exactly cancel those in the first which<br />

involve a gauge potential, thereby reducing the covariant derivatives to partial ones.<br />

All that remains is a Lagrangian of (at least classically) free fields,<br />

L0 = ∂ µ ¯ϕi ∂µϕ i − i ↔<br />

χσ<br />

µ<br />

∂µ<br />

2<br />

¯χ ↔<br />

µ<br />

+ ψσ ∂µ ¯ ψ + EF i Fi<br />

¯ , (1.60)<br />

where a total derivative has been dropped. Now consider the second linear superfield<br />

L ij m. It yields the Lagrangian<br />

1<br />

m Lm = iA µ ↔<br />

¯ϕi ∂µϕ i + Aµ(χσ µ ¯χ − ψσ µ ψ) ¯ i<br />

− iE(F ¯ϕi − ϕ i Fi) ¯ − i Yij ¯ϕ i ϕ j<br />

− i( ¯ Z ¯χ ψ¯ − Zχψ) − i ϕ i ( ¯ λi ¯χ − λiψ) + i ¯ϕi(λ i + ¯ λ i ψ) ¯ .<br />

(1.61)<br />

This one involves couplings of the gauge potential to combinations of the scalars and<br />

spinors which are reminiscent of U(1) currents, and indeed we find that the complete<br />

Lagrangian, i.e. the sum L0 + Lm + Lcc,<br />

L = ∇ µ ¯ϕi ∇µϕ i − i ↔<br />

χσ<br />

µ<br />

∇µ<br />

2<br />

¯χ ↔<br />

µ<br />

+ ψσ ∇µ ¯ ψ + E |F i + imϕ i | 2<br />

− m 2 |Z| 2 ¯ϕiϕ i − im( ¯ Z ¯χ ψ¯ − Zχψ) − im Yij ¯ϕ i ϕ j<br />

− im ϕ i ( ¯ λi ¯χ − λiψ) + im ¯ϕi(λ iχ + ¯ λ i ¯ ψ) + Lcc ,<br />

(1.62)<br />

describes nothing but (a special kind of) N = 2 supersymmetric electrodynamics. Here<br />

the operator ∇µ is defined by<br />

∇µ<br />

⎛<br />

ϕ<br />

⎝<br />

i<br />

⎞<br />

⎛<br />

ϕ<br />

χ ⎠ = (∂µ − imAµ) ⎝<br />

¯ψ<br />

i<br />

⎞<br />

χ ⎠ .<br />

¯ψ<br />

(1.63)<br />

Hence, on-shell the gauged central charge generates just local U(1) transformations<br />

<strong>with</strong> an electric charge that is given by m (or rather mgz after a rescaling Aµ → gzAµ).<br />

This may also be seen from the equation of motion for the auxiliary scalars ¯ Fi (the<br />

relation ≈ denotes on-shell equality),<br />

δL<br />

δ ¯ Fi<br />

= E(F i + imϕ i ) ≈ 0 . (1.64)<br />

Since two superfields are equal if the lowest components coincide, we thus have<br />

δzϕ i ≈ −imϕ i<br />

(1.65)<br />

for the full superfield. One may verify that this is in agreement <strong>with</strong> the eqs. (1.53).<br />

Note that since 〈Z〉 = i, the masses of the “electron” (χ, ¯ ψ) and its superpartners ϕ i<br />

are given by the parameter m (where we assume m ≥ 0),<br />

M (χ, ¯ ψ) = Mϕ = m , (1.66)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!