03.06.2013 Views

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24 Chapter 2. The Vector-Tensor Multiplet<br />

and finally the part DαiWα ˙α, which together <strong>with</strong> eq. (2.30) gives the complete supersymmetry<br />

transformation of W µ ,<br />

D i αWββ ˙ = −Dββ˙ ψ i <br />

α − εαβ 2iZ¯ δz ¯ ψ i + ¯ λ i U <br />

i<br />

˙β + 2εαβ D γ ij<br />

j N<br />

γ ˙ i −<br />

β 3 D ij<br />

j(αN β) ˙ . (2.32)<br />

β<br />

Before going any further, let us examine eqs. (2.31). We observe a structure similar<br />

to that of the central charge transformations of the spinors in the hypermultiplet, eqs.<br />

(1.53), namely the equations for δzψ i and δz ¯ ψ i are coupled by virtue of the covariant<br />

derivative. Let us try to solve for δzψ i . For convenience we introduce the abbreviation<br />

and calculate<br />

η i α ≡ λ i αU − 1<br />

3 Dαj ¯ M ij − i<br />

3 ¯ D ˙α j N ij<br />

α ˙α<br />

|Z| 2 δzψ i α = iAα ˙α ¯ Zδz ¯ ψ ˙αi + i ¯ Z(∂α ˙α ¯ ψ ˙αi − η i α)<br />

= Aα ˙α(D ˙αβ ψ i β − ¯η ˙αi ) + i ¯ Z(∂α ˙α ¯ ψ ˙αi − η i α)<br />

= Aα ˙αA ˙αβ δzψ i β + Aα ˙α(∂ ˙αβ ψ i β − ¯η ˙αi ) + i ¯ Z(∂α ˙α ¯ ψ ˙αi − η i α) .<br />

Again the prefactor E, defined in eq. (1.55), emerges. We have now eliminated δz ¯ ψ i ,<br />

provided that η i or its complex conjugate does not contain such a term. We assume<br />

this to be the case 3 . Then the action of the central charge generator on ψ i reads<br />

δzψ i α = 1 <br />

iZ(∂α ¯<br />

˙α<br />

E<br />

¯ ψ ˙αi − η i α) + Aα ˙α(∂ ˙αβ ψ i β − ¯η ˙αi ) . (2.33)<br />

This expression does not appear to be covariant <strong>with</strong> respect to local central charge<br />

transformations, as the gauge potential occurs explicitly. However, from eq. (2.31) it<br />

should be clear that δzψ i is indeed a tensor, and one may verify that all the differentiated<br />

gauge parameters cancel when calculating the central charge transformation of δzψ i<br />

proceeding from eq. (2.33). In what follows it is advantageous to use the manifestly<br />

covariant expression (2.31) rather than the complicated equation (2.33).<br />

We resume the evaluation of the supersymmetry algebra <strong>with</strong> the anticommutator<br />

{D i α , D j<br />

β } ¯ ψ k ˙α<br />

!<br />

= εαβε ij ¯ Z δz ¯ ψ k ˙α .<br />

From eq. (2.27) we see that this involves D j<br />

β Wα ˙α, which is given in eq. (2.32). We find<br />

that the equation is fulfilled identically provided the consistency condition (C.2) holds,<br />

so we obtain no new information.<br />

Next we investigate the consequences of the requirement that the central charge generator<br />

δz commute <strong>with</strong> the supersymmetry generator D i α,<br />

[ δz , D i α ] ψ j<br />

β<br />

!<br />

= 0 .<br />

In this equation we encounter two generators Di α, ¯ Di ˙α acting on the deformations M ij<br />

. From now on we assume the supersymmetry transformations of these fields<br />

and N ij<br />

α ˙α<br />

3 All consistent constraints that we present in the following chapters have this property.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!