03.06.2013 Views

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Nonpolynomial Interactions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.3. The Lagrangian 45<br />

7) 0 = ∂ ¯ β − β<br />

¯Z − Z<br />

9) 0 = ∂L ¯ δ 10) 0 = ∂ ¯ δ .<br />

8) 0 = ∂β − 2∂Lδ − β<br />

¯Z − Z<br />

From eqs. 3), 4) and 9), 10) it follows that α = α(Z) and δ = δ(Z), respectively. Since<br />

α does not depend on L, we can integrate eq. 6),<br />

β = 2¯αL<br />

Z − ¯ Z + ˆ β(Z, ¯ Z) .<br />

Next we insert this into eq. 8); the L-dependent terms cancel and the Z-dependence of<br />

ˆβ is fixed,<br />

∂ ˆ β = − ˆ β<br />

Z − ¯ Z ⇒ ˆ β = ¯ h( ¯ Z)<br />

Z − ¯ Z .<br />

Now we can determine α from eq. 5),<br />

∂α =<br />

α + ¯α<br />

Z − ¯ Z<br />

⇒ α = i(κZ + ϱ) , κ, ϱ ∈ R . (3.48)<br />

We use this in eq. 7) to derive an analogous condition on ¯ h( ¯ Z),<br />

¯∂ ¯ h = − h + ¯ h<br />

Z − ¯ Z ⇒ ¯ h = −2i (ν ¯ Z + µ) , ν, µ ∈ R .<br />

With α and β known, eq. 1) may be integrated. The reality of γ requires ν = 0, and<br />

we find<br />

γ = − i 2ϱ + κ(Z +<br />

2<br />

¯ Z)<br />

Z − ¯ L<br />

Z<br />

2 − iµ<br />

Z − ¯ Z L + σ(Z, ¯ Z) , (3.49)<br />

<strong>with</strong> σ real. It remains to solve eq. 2). When β and γ are inserted, the L-dependent<br />

terms drop out and we are left <strong>with</strong> δ = ∂σ. Eq. 10) then implies<br />

σ(Z, ¯ Z) = f(Z) + ¯ f( ¯ Z) , (3.50)<br />

where f is an arbitrary function of Z. We have thus found the most general linear<br />

multiplet one can build from the linear vector-tensor multiplet <strong>with</strong> gauged central<br />

charge.<br />

When the coefficients are inserted into the Ansatz (2.58), it comes as no surprise that<br />

several terms group together to form the expression iD (i D j) L, as this is evidently a<br />

linear superfield by itself (cf. the remark in section 2.3.1). The complete pre-Lagrangian<br />

finally reads<br />

where<br />

L ij<br />

L ij = L ij<br />

linVT + Lij cc , (3.51)<br />

linVT = iϱ D i L D j L − ¯ D i L ¯ D j L + L D (i D j) L + iµ D (i D j) L<br />

<br />

2L <br />

+ iκ ¯Z (i j)<br />

¯Z<br />

D Z D L + Z ¯ (i<br />

D Z¯ ¯ j) 1 D L + 4 − Z<br />

L (Z + ¯ Z) D i D j Z <br />

+ Z D i L D j L − ¯ Z ¯ D i L ¯ D j <br />

L , ϱ, µ, κ ∈ R ,<br />

(3.52)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!