04.06.2013 Views

The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...

The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...

The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Owners <strong>and</strong> Fences 71<br />

lem of labor discipl<strong>in</strong>e afflict<strong>in</strong>g the manager of Japio <strong>in</strong> 1882,—"We<br />

cannot f<strong>in</strong>d workers even though one trips over idlers every day." In<br />

the words of the old mayordomo of the largest estate <strong>in</strong> the southern<br />

Cauca Valley, that of the Holgu<strong>in</strong>s', describ<strong>in</strong>g the return of the<br />

owners <strong>in</strong> 1913, "<strong>The</strong>y came to dom<strong>in</strong>ate the negroes <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong><br />

their hacienda." Rural proletarianization began <strong>in</strong> earnest. National<br />

censuses <strong>in</strong>dicate that wage laborers constituted a mere fifth of the<br />

number of smallholders <strong>in</strong> 1912. But by 1938 the proportions had reversed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> wage laborers were a third larger than the number of<br />

smallholders <strong>and</strong> had <strong>in</strong>creased fivefold.<br />

Why wasn't a capitalist economy developed on the basis of commercial<br />

peasant farmers? Why did it develop by means of large estates<br />

<strong>and</strong> wage labor? <strong>The</strong> social organization of the peasants posed<br />

an obstacle to capitalist <strong>in</strong>stitutions. <strong>The</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g of l<strong>and</strong> was<br />

shrouded <strong>in</strong> a maze of <strong>in</strong>tensely personalistic relations based on different<br />

rights <strong>and</strong> obligations woven <strong>in</strong>to a k<strong>in</strong>ship system of multiple<br />

marital unions. To some extent the peasants produced for the national<br />

market, but consumed few market commodities. <strong>The</strong>y were<br />

neither easily able nor zealous <strong>in</strong> exp<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g a surplus. Without the<br />

clearly drawn l<strong>in</strong>es of private property <strong>in</strong> the modern bourgeois<br />

sense, they were refractory to the f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ducements<br />

that met <strong>and</strong> attracted the rul<strong>in</strong>g classes. <strong>The</strong> peasants' bonds<br />

of k<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d meant that capital accumulation was a virtual impossibility.<br />

Wealth, not capital, might be amassed, but only to be divided<br />

among the succeed<strong>in</strong>g generations. Of course, merchant capital<br />

could coexist with this form of social organization, but s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

national capital accumulation dem<strong>and</strong>ed an ever-<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g domestic<br />

market, peasants who cont<strong>in</strong>ued to practice self-subsistence<br />

were an obstacle to progress. Whatever the <strong>in</strong>tricate calculus of the<br />

emerg<strong>in</strong>g system, its <strong>in</strong>itial push was to destroy a form of social organization<br />

embedded <strong>in</strong> a nonmarket mode of us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Describ<strong>in</strong>g the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of enclosures, an old peasant tells how<br />

Jaime Gomez came. "He began to usurp, to rob, to damage, <strong>and</strong> to<br />

disquiet the residents of Barragan, Qu<strong>in</strong>tero, Ob<strong>and</strong>o, <strong>and</strong> so on.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n you had to flee or sell. In Barragan he broke the houses <strong>and</strong><br />

erased the communism, the comuneros, because there were comuneios<br />

there." Systems of teamwork, festive labor parties <strong>and</strong> reciprocal<br />

labor exchange, were <strong>in</strong> force. "<strong>The</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ga [festive labor]. In<br />

that week you sk<strong>in</strong> a pig, a chicken, a calf, or whatever, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>vite<br />

your neighbors to work. <strong>The</strong>y are work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> others are prepar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the meal from those animals. One or two days, whatever it is. One<br />

month or a week later I do the same. This we called the m<strong>in</strong>ga. It's

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!