The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...
The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...
The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4 <strong>Devil</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Commodity</strong> <strong>Fetishism</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>America</strong><br />
tures to account for the phantom objectivity with which capitalist<br />
culture enshrouds its social creations.<br />
Time, space, matter, cause, relation, human nature, <strong>and</strong> society itself<br />
are social products created by man just as are the different types<br />
of tools, farm<strong>in</strong>g systems, clothes, houses, monuments, languages,<br />
myths, <strong>and</strong> so on, that mank<strong>in</strong>d has produced s<strong>in</strong>ce the dawn of<br />
human life. But to their participants, all cultures tend to present<br />
these categories as if they were not social products but elemental<br />
<strong>and</strong> immutable th<strong>in</strong>gs. As soon as such categories are def<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />
natural, rather than as social, products, epistemology itself acts to<br />
conceal underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of the social order. Our experience, our underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g,<br />
our explanations—all serve merely to ratify the conventions<br />
that susta<strong>in</strong> our sense of reality unless we appreciate the<br />
extent to which the basic "build<strong>in</strong>g blocks" of our experience <strong>and</strong><br />
our sensed reality are not natural but social constructions.<br />
In capitalist culture this bl<strong>in</strong>dness to the social basis of essential<br />
categories makes a social read<strong>in</strong>g of supposedly natural th<strong>in</strong>gs deeply<br />
perplex<strong>in</strong>g. This is due to the peculiar character of the abstractions<br />
associated with the market organization of human affairs: essential<br />
qualities of human be<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> their products are converted<br />
<strong>in</strong>to commodities, <strong>in</strong>to th<strong>in</strong>gs for buy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> sell<strong>in</strong>g on the market.<br />
Take the example of labor <strong>and</strong> labor-time. For our system of <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
production to operate, people's productive capacities <strong>and</strong> nature's<br />
resources have to be organized <strong>in</strong>to markets <strong>and</strong> rationalized<br />
<strong>in</strong> accord with cost account<strong>in</strong>g: the unity of production <strong>and</strong> human<br />
life is broken <strong>in</strong>to smaller <strong>and</strong> smaller quantifiable subcomponents.<br />
Labor, an activity of life itself, thus becomes someth<strong>in</strong>g set apart<br />
from life <strong>and</strong> abstracted <strong>in</strong>to the commodity of labor-time, which<br />
can be bought <strong>and</strong> sold on the labor market. This commodity appears<br />
to be substantial <strong>and</strong> real. No longer an abstraction, it appears<br />
to be someth<strong>in</strong>g natural <strong>and</strong> immutable, even though it is noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />
more than a convention or a social construction emerg<strong>in</strong>g from a<br />
specific way of organiz<strong>in</strong>g persons relative to one another <strong>and</strong> to nature.<br />
I take this process as a paradigm of the object-mak<strong>in</strong>g process<br />
<strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dustrial capitalist society: specifically, concepts such as labor-time<br />
are abstracted from the social context <strong>and</strong> appear to be real<br />
th<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
Of necessity, a commodity-based society produces such phantom<br />
objectivity, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> so do<strong>in</strong>g it obscures its roots—the relations<br />
between people. This amounts to a socially <strong>in</strong>stituted paradox with<br />
bewilder<strong>in</strong>g manifestations, the chief of which is the denial by the<br />
society's members of the social construction of reality. Another<br />
manifestation is the schizoid attitude with which the members of