04.06.2013 Views

The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...

The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...

The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER I<br />

<strong>Fetishism</strong> <strong>and</strong> Dialectical Deconstruction<br />

his book attempts to <strong>in</strong>terpret what are to us<br />

T<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustrialized world the exotic ideas of<br />

some rural people <strong>in</strong> Colombia <strong>and</strong> Bolivia concern<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the mean<strong>in</strong>g of the capitalist relations of<br />

production <strong>and</strong> exchange <strong>in</strong>to which they are<br />

daily be<strong>in</strong>g drawn. <strong>The</strong>se peasants represent as vividly unnatural,<br />

even as evil, practices that most of us <strong>in</strong> commodity-based societies<br />

have come to accept as natural <strong>in</strong> the everyday work<strong>in</strong>gs of our<br />

economy, <strong>and</strong> therefore of the world <strong>in</strong> general. This representation<br />

occurs only when they are proletarianized <strong>and</strong> refers only to the way<br />

of life that is organized by capitalist relations of production. It neither<br />

occurs <strong>in</strong> nor refers to peasant ways of life.<br />

Any work of <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>in</strong>cludes elements of uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tellectual self-effacement. For what truth is be<strong>in</strong>g displayed by<br />

one's <strong>in</strong>terpretation? Is it noth<strong>in</strong>g more than a mediation between<br />

the unfamiliar <strong>and</strong> the familiar? Assuredly, that is the more honest,<br />

if less gr<strong>and</strong>iose, practice of the <strong>in</strong>terpreter,- yet, <strong>in</strong> confront<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

implications of this practice we discern that the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of<br />

the unfamiliar <strong>in</strong> terms of the familiar impugns the familiar itself.<br />

<strong>The</strong> truth of <strong>in</strong>terpretation lies <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>tellectual structure of contrasts,<br />

<strong>and</strong> its reality is <strong>in</strong>herently self-critical.<br />

So, although this work focuses on the cultural reactions of peasants<br />

to <strong>in</strong>dustrial capitalism <strong>and</strong> attempts to <strong>in</strong>terpret those reactions,<br />

it is, <strong>in</strong>evitably, also an esoteric attempt to critically illum<strong>in</strong>ate<br />

the ways by which those of us who are long accustomed to<br />

capitalist culture have arrived at the po<strong>in</strong>t at which this familiarity<br />

persuades us that our cultural form is not historical, not social, not<br />

human, but natural—"th<strong>in</strong>g-like" <strong>and</strong> physical. In other words, it is<br />

an attempt forced upon us by confrontation with precapitalist cul-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!