The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...
The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...
The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
110 <strong>Devil</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Commodity</strong> <strong>Fetishism</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>America</strong><br />
er evil when it is directed aga<strong>in</strong>st the greater evil of exploitation,<br />
failure to reciprocate, <strong>and</strong> the amass<strong>in</strong>g of ill-gotten ga<strong>in</strong>s. Those<br />
who are better off constantly fear sorcery <strong>and</strong> take magical steps to<br />
prevent its penetration. And with good reason. A close friend of<br />
m<strong>in</strong>e told me how his desperately poor mother <strong>and</strong> her three children<br />
were evicted by a l<strong>and</strong>lord for not pay<strong>in</strong>g rent. In fury she retaliated<br />
by ensorcell<strong>in</strong>g the house. Nobody dared live <strong>in</strong> the house<br />
thereafter. In another case a friend of m<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> his fellow worker <strong>in</strong><br />
the plantations tried to bribe a tallyman <strong>in</strong>to record<strong>in</strong>g more work<br />
than they had done. <strong>The</strong> tallyman refused, <strong>and</strong> they solicited an Indian<br />
magician so as to dispose of him through sorcery.<br />
Although murky premonitions of class struggle can be seen <strong>in</strong> this<br />
envy-laden sorcery, not all sorcery is directed by the poor aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />
better off; neither is sorcery directed aga<strong>in</strong>st the true rul<strong>in</strong>g class—<br />
the plantation owners or the heads of government, for example. People<br />
give two reasons for the absence of sorcery aga<strong>in</strong>st the feared <strong>and</strong><br />
hated rul<strong>in</strong>g class. First, the rulers don't believe <strong>in</strong> sorcery. Second,<br />
even if they did, they could employ superior magicians because they<br />
are far wealthier. <strong>The</strong>se are <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g reasons because <strong>in</strong> areas of<br />
southwest Colombia that have less capitalist development, such as<br />
the hacienda areas <strong>in</strong> the mounta<strong>in</strong>s, the hacienda owners do <strong>in</strong><br />
fact believe that many of their misfortunes are due to the sorcery of<br />
their peons. <strong>The</strong>se hacienda owners combat such sorcery by mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
expensive pilgrimages to Indian shamans whose fees or remoteness<br />
puts them beyond the reach of the peons (who, nevertheless, persist<br />
with their mystical form of class warfare). This does not occur <strong>in</strong> the<br />
agribus<strong>in</strong>ess areas; hence, I conclude that the more critical of the<br />
two reasons given above is the one that the people emphasize: agribus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
owners do not believe <strong>in</strong> this sort of sorcery.<br />
This <strong>in</strong>dicates that the people who believe <strong>in</strong> sorcery recognize<br />
that the sorcerer's power depends upon the existence of a shared culture,<br />
through which medium sorcery achieves its end. In acknowledg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the <strong>in</strong>credulity <strong>and</strong> hence immunity of their rulers, the work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
class of the plantations thus acknowledges <strong>and</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ates<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> the culture of classes as such cultures change <strong>in</strong> accordance<br />
with the transformation <strong>in</strong> the modes of production—from<br />
hacienda production to agribus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />
In the proletarian devil contracts the plantation owners are not<br />
aimed at or afflicted, at least not directly. It is alleged that by means<br />
of the contract the worker <strong>in</strong> the capitalist mode of production, <strong>and</strong><br />
only <strong>in</strong> this mode, becomes more productive—more productive of<br />
<strong>in</strong>come <strong>and</strong> of barrenness. As we shall see <strong>in</strong> chapter 7, such a belief<br />
is the logical outcome of the confrontation of a philosophy based on