04.06.2013 Views

The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...

The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...

The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9O <strong>Devil</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Commodity</strong> <strong>Fetishism</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>America</strong><br />

TABLE i:<br />

Comparisons between peasant farmers <strong>and</strong> plantation workers <strong>in</strong><br />

the Cauca Valley, Colombia, 1970-76<br />

Peasant Farmer on<br />

Two-Hectare Plot Plantation<br />

Traditional Modern Worker<br />

Annual net <strong>in</strong>come, 1971<br />

(Colombian pesos) $10,000 $ 8,000 $10,000<br />

Number of hectares per<br />

worker 1.0-2.0 1.0-2.0 3.2<br />

Labor days required per<br />

year 105 243 275<br />

Individual's labor energy<br />

output per work<strong>in</strong>g day<br />

(kcal) 1,70<br />

1,700 3,500<br />

Individual's labor energy<br />

output per year (kcal) 173,000 415,000 804,000<br />

Note: Data on traditional peasant farm<strong>in</strong>g come from my monitor<strong>in</strong>g of four plots<br />

every two weeks for n<strong>in</strong>e months <strong>in</strong> 1971. Data on modern peasant farm<strong>in</strong>g come<br />

from similar on-site fieldwork <strong>in</strong> six plots <strong>in</strong> 1972 <strong>and</strong> 1976. Data on plantations<br />

come from Fedesarrollo (1976) <strong>and</strong> from personal <strong>in</strong>terviews with plantation personnel.<br />

Labor energy expenditures (7.4 kcal per m<strong>in</strong>ute) for plantation workers were calculated<br />

by Spurr et al. (1975 : 992) us<strong>in</strong>g respirometry techniques on local cane cutters<br />

<strong>and</strong> loaders; those for peasant labor were <strong>in</strong>directly calculated from tables <strong>in</strong> Durn<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Passmore (1967). An alternative lower assessment for plantation workers by<br />

Spurr et al. was ignored, as this was derived by methods conflict<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>and</strong> not comparable<br />

with those used by Durn<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> Passmore. Sugar plantation energy efficiency<br />

is calculated only on the basis of its three ma<strong>in</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>puts (<strong>and</strong> therefore has been<br />

overestimated): (a) human labor, 197,000 kcal per ton of sugar; (b) electricity, 1 12,000<br />

kcal per ton of sugar; (c) fuel oil, 452,000 kcal per ton of sugar. Traditional peasant<br />

farm<strong>in</strong>g energy efficiency is calculated only on the energy <strong>in</strong>put-output ratio <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

directly with cocoa production, assum<strong>in</strong>g a low average yield of 290 kg per <strong>in</strong>terplanted<br />

hectare, as determ<strong>in</strong>ed by fieldwork. Household tasks, such as draw<strong>in</strong>g water,<br />

were not <strong>in</strong>cluded as energy <strong>in</strong>puts. <strong>The</strong> ratios came to 5 : r for sugar plantations, <strong>and</strong><br />

30: i for peasant cocoa farm<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

vested—their "capital efficiency"—is the same as or higher than<br />

that of the large farmers (depend<strong>in</strong>g on whether or not one budgets<br />

the peasant l<strong>and</strong>owner's own labor as a cost). This is just as true<br />

when we compare the profit rates of the peasants on the new crops<br />

with those of the sugar plantations. If we were to make the compari-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!