The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...
The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...
The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America - autonomous ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9O <strong>Devil</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Commodity</strong> <strong>Fetishism</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>America</strong><br />
TABLE i:<br />
Comparisons between peasant farmers <strong>and</strong> plantation workers <strong>in</strong><br />
the Cauca Valley, Colombia, 1970-76<br />
Peasant Farmer on<br />
Two-Hectare Plot Plantation<br />
Traditional Modern Worker<br />
Annual net <strong>in</strong>come, 1971<br />
(Colombian pesos) $10,000 $ 8,000 $10,000<br />
Number of hectares per<br />
worker 1.0-2.0 1.0-2.0 3.2<br />
Labor days required per<br />
year 105 243 275<br />
Individual's labor energy<br />
output per work<strong>in</strong>g day<br />
(kcal) 1,70<br />
1,700 3,500<br />
Individual's labor energy<br />
output per year (kcal) 173,000 415,000 804,000<br />
Note: Data on traditional peasant farm<strong>in</strong>g come from my monitor<strong>in</strong>g of four plots<br />
every two weeks for n<strong>in</strong>e months <strong>in</strong> 1971. Data on modern peasant farm<strong>in</strong>g come<br />
from similar on-site fieldwork <strong>in</strong> six plots <strong>in</strong> 1972 <strong>and</strong> 1976. Data on plantations<br />
come from Fedesarrollo (1976) <strong>and</strong> from personal <strong>in</strong>terviews with plantation personnel.<br />
Labor energy expenditures (7.4 kcal per m<strong>in</strong>ute) for plantation workers were calculated<br />
by Spurr et al. (1975 : 992) us<strong>in</strong>g respirometry techniques on local cane cutters<br />
<strong>and</strong> loaders; those for peasant labor were <strong>in</strong>directly calculated from tables <strong>in</strong> Durn<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> Passmore (1967). An alternative lower assessment for plantation workers by<br />
Spurr et al. was ignored, as this was derived by methods conflict<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>and</strong> not comparable<br />
with those used by Durn<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> Passmore. Sugar plantation energy efficiency<br />
is calculated only on the basis of its three ma<strong>in</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>puts (<strong>and</strong> therefore has been<br />
overestimated): (a) human labor, 197,000 kcal per ton of sugar; (b) electricity, 1 12,000<br />
kcal per ton of sugar; (c) fuel oil, 452,000 kcal per ton of sugar. Traditional peasant<br />
farm<strong>in</strong>g energy efficiency is calculated only on the energy <strong>in</strong>put-output ratio <strong>in</strong>volved<br />
directly with cocoa production, assum<strong>in</strong>g a low average yield of 290 kg per <strong>in</strong>terplanted<br />
hectare, as determ<strong>in</strong>ed by fieldwork. Household tasks, such as draw<strong>in</strong>g water,<br />
were not <strong>in</strong>cluded as energy <strong>in</strong>puts. <strong>The</strong> ratios came to 5 : r for sugar plantations, <strong>and</strong><br />
30: i for peasant cocoa farm<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
vested—their "capital efficiency"—is the same as or higher than<br />
that of the large farmers (depend<strong>in</strong>g on whether or not one budgets<br />
the peasant l<strong>and</strong>owner's own labor as a cost). This is just as true<br />
when we compare the profit rates of the peasants on the new crops<br />
with those of the sugar plantations. If we were to make the compari-